01-30-2011, 02:11 AM
Dear Theo,
thank you very much for your comment. I also agree with Caballo that it is not question to do further discussions on the topic. As you could see I did not reply even to them, from the answers of the people on this site it was clear the difference between the people who really is interested to a true and objective analysis of the Roman military World, also with different opinions and views, and the people that has got just a superficial or very little knowledge of the Roman World in general.
I hope that the second volume of Arms and Armour (the III in the series) will be pleased by all the true lovers of Roman military, not question if then it will be subject of discussions or even criticism if the criticism will be useful for all of us.
Thanks again
Raf
thank you very much for your comment. I also agree with Caballo that it is not question to do further discussions on the topic. As you could see I did not reply even to them, from the answers of the people on this site it was clear the difference between the people who really is interested to a true and objective analysis of the Roman military World, also with different opinions and views, and the people that has got just a superficial or very little knowledge of the Roman World in general.
I hope that the second volume of Arms and Armour (the III in the series) will be pleased by all the true lovers of Roman military, not question if then it will be subject of discussions or even criticism if the criticism will be useful for all of us.
Thanks again
Raf
