Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1st Century Roman Leather Pouch Link
#26
Very good point Paul. Just because you cannot see it doesn't mean it isn't there. They have to have something to carry money in. On the march it might not be necessary, but it wasn't exactly a barter system for what soldiers typically want. Booze and women aren't exactly free or cheap. Even using brothel tokens you have to have somewhere to put those as well. Gambling was common and as a soldier you can't exactly just give away your equipment for payment so its fair to say most everyone probably would have had a money pouch concealed on his person.
Derek D. Estabrook
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: 1st Century Roman Leather Pouch Link - by MatthewD - 08-12-2007, 02:53 AM
Re: 1st Century Roman Leather Pouch Link - by Wes - 08-12-2007, 01:03 PM
Re: 1st Century Roman Leather Pouch Link - by Wes - 08-12-2007, 07:16 PM
Re: 1st Century Roman Leather Pouch Link - by Wes - 08-14-2007, 02:49 PM
Re: 1st Century Roman Leather Pouch Link - by Ironhand - 08-15-2007, 11:20 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Leather working tools 1st/2nd century AD scotti73 6 2,769 10-19-2013, 08:37 AM
Last Post: Robert
  Pouch from Israel Martin Moser 45 9,491 11-28-2010, 07:46 PM
Last Post: Martin Moser
  The Pouch version pivus 23 4,803 01-26-2009, 08:30 AM
Last Post: Robert

Forum Jump: