Ave,
Thanks Theo! I do try to be as resourceful as possible! :wink:
Joel Boynton said:Quote:I always thought eagle headed gladii looked good and toyed with the idea of making one of my own. Of course, only if the lower ranks could have them. Perhaps they're marks of distinction?
Joel- You present a good question.
First and foremost, please check with your Centurion or Legion commander and make sure that they will accept an eagle’s head on your gladius.
My personal opinion is, the overwhelming evidence shows that the vast majority, if not possible all, legionary would not have carried an eagle headed sword. Conjecturally, it is very possible that, in rare instances, they could have; as for why…
As to whether or not an ancient legionary solider ‘could’ carry a gladius with an eagle head, I have never read any ancient text where it said they were forbidden, nor have I read any ancient text that stated they could or did.
As far as ancient evidence, I have seen and heard of the following… grave stones of Centurions with eagle headed swords (that is most likely the same reference noted above by Theo) and seen them in the hands of Emperors (typically on a short sword called a Parazonium above) and I have seen sculptures of a weapons cache (also above) which show both standard issue gladiuses along with two gladiuses with eagles heads, and also two other Greek swords with eagles heads.
UPDATE: The image in the post below, supplied by Jona, shows Emperor Philip the Arab, who at the time of the sculpture was the Prefect of Gordian the third’s Praetorian Guard, carrying an eagle headed sword. So, unless all the art references are incorrect, then eagle headed swords existed and were carried by Centurions, Prefects, Emperors, etc at least from time to time.
During the Republic (pre-Marius) the armies were made up of mostly the upper class that purchased their own equipment. I would speculate that a wealthy family could hand down armor (as any other) but, that armor might be more elaborate. Of course families handed down armor throughout the history of Roman, not just in the Republican period, and any solider could find or plunder an eagle headed sword during any quest.
There is also cost to consider as well. It would take a more skilled craftsman to fabricate an eagle head handle, and make it look good, as opposed to a standard issue handle. The better looking handle would most likely take longer to make, if given the choice most (with the money to do so) would be willing to pay more for the ‘cooler’ looking handle, and thusly… a gladius with an eagle’s head would cost more. The cost could have been more than double a standard issue sword. Just think, if Deepeeka offers a Mainz Galdius for $120 they would most likely be asking $199 to $225 for the one with an eagle’s head.
The biggest problem with a legionary carrying an eagle head sword, and most purists will also note, is that the ancient evidence does not support many various styles of handles, some minor differences here and there but most swords, as well as pugios, were all very similar in style during their eras, Pompeii style, Mainz style, Spartha style, etc. It was the scabbard details, specifically the plates that were very often customized, not so much the sword blades or the handles. Many were plain, most likely due to cost, whereas others on display today in museums are very elaborate.
As for having an eagle head sword given to a legionary as a mark of distinction, that does make logical sense however; here again, I have never read of such a thing. Promotions to the Avicardi after 16 years of service, disks awarded to Centurions, land given to veterans, etc but I haven’t read of swords or swords with eagle’s heads being given out though.
In closing my personal opinion is agian, the overwhelming evidence shows that the vast majority, if not possible all, legionary would not have carried an eagle headed sword. Conjecturally, it is very possible that, in rare instances, they could have and did.