Posts: 20
Threads: 4
Joined: Aug 2006
Reputation:
0
I am putting together a 1st cent. AD cornician impression and it's time to get hamata. Which style is seen/seen most in the surviving art (i.e doubled or not)?
TIB. CLAVDIVS ZENO
A.K.A. John D.
Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus
Posts: 4,887
Threads: 163
Joined: Aug 2002
Reputation:
0
I'd say either. Personal preference really.
If I were to choose one type, it would be with a cape doubling as seen on the grave stele of standard bearers. But, that's MY personal choice. :wink:
Alternatively, why not go for squamata?
Posts: 20
Threads: 4
Joined: Aug 2006
Reputation:
0
Thanks, I may go that route when I have the time and money to make my own. :?
The Find It stuff is (just) within my reach.
hock:
TIB. CLAVDIVS ZENO
A.K.A. John D.
Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus
Posts: 4,887
Threads: 163
Joined: Aug 2002
Reputation:
0
I'd do what Edge (Gaivs Calvus) did to his 'find-it' hamata - which is to remove the leathering on the bottom hem, and replace the fastening hooks. :wink:
Posts: 20
Threads: 4
Joined: Aug 2006
Reputation:
0
Okay. Thanks agian.
I'll also go back and read that thread again.
TIB. CLAVDIVS ZENO
A.K.A. John D.
Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus