RomanArmyTalk › Research Arena › Ancient Civ Talk v
Chinese Roman interaction.

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Linear Mode
Chinese Roman interaction.
Robert Vermaat Offline
Decurio Speculatorum
*******
Posts: 15,116
Threads: 415
Joined: Mar 2002
Reputation: 78
#35
01-17-2008, 11:56 PM
Quote:
Quote:They aren't yin-yang symbols.
Are you sure? Where does the yin-yang symbol derive from. If it is Buddhist, then there's a possibility that, just like the ubiquitous swaztika, they could both come from the same indo-european source.

Even if that were the case (and I'm not saying it's not) they not yin-yang symbols. The palace at Pylos, while showing swastikas, also was not decorated with Nazi symbols. Know what I'm saying? Same shape, same ancestry, different meaning.
Robert Vermaat
MODERATOR
FECTIO Late Romans
THE CAUSE OF WAR MUST BE JUST
(Maurikios-Strategikon, book VIII.2: Maxim 12)
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Chinese Roman interaction. - by Felix Agrippa - 09-15-2006, 06:18 PM
Re: Chinese Roman interaction. - by Eleatic Guest - 09-16-2006, 01:39 AM
Re: Chinese Roman interaction. - by tlclark - 09-16-2006, 03:29 AM
Re: Chinese Roman interaction. - by Susanna - 09-16-2006, 03:03 PM
Re: Chinese Roman interaction. - by Felix Agrippa - 09-16-2006, 08:47 PM
Re: Chinese Roman interaction. - by Sergey Lenkov - 09-30-2006, 08:35 AM
Re: Chinese Roman interaction. - by Eleatic Guest - 10-05-2006, 12:05 PM
Re: Chinese Roman interaction. - by Susanna - 10-05-2006, 12:11 PM
Re: Chinese Roman interaction. - by Sergey Lenkov - 10-05-2006, 06:13 PM
Re: Chinese Roman interaction. - by Eleatic Guest - 10-09-2006, 12:22 AM
Re: Chinese Roman interaction. - by Sergey Lenkov - 10-09-2006, 06:55 AM
Re: Chinese Roman interaction. - by Eleatic Guest - 10-09-2006, 03:48 PM
Re: Chinese Roman interaction. - by Sergey Lenkov - 10-09-2006, 08:42 PM
Re: Chinese Roman interaction. - by Lothia - 10-30-2006, 01:59 AM
Re: Chinese Roman interaction. - by M.H. White - 11-09-2006, 01:14 AM
Re: Chinese Roman interaction. - by Felix Agrippa - 11-09-2006, 05:44 PM
Re: Chinese Roman interaction. - by L C Cinna - 11-09-2006, 11:43 PM
Re: Chinese Roman interaction. - by Martin Moser - 11-10-2006, 06:43 AM
Re: Chinese Roman interaction. - by Sergey Lenkov - 11-10-2006, 01:12 PM
Re: Chinese Roman interaction. - by SOCL - 11-10-2006, 05:26 PM
Re: Chinese Roman interaction. - by M.H. White - 11-10-2006, 06:47 PM
Re: Chinese Roman interaction. - by Sergey Lenkov - 11-10-2006, 07:43 PM
Re: Chinese Roman interaction. - by floofthegoof - 11-13-2006, 03:26 PM
Re: Chinese Roman interaction. - by ursus - 01-03-2008, 09:35 PM
Re: Chinese Roman interaction. - by ursus - 01-04-2008, 04:06 AM
Re: Chinese Roman interaction. - by Eleatic Guest - 01-09-2008, 03:17 PM
Re: Chinese Roman interaction. - by PMBardunias - 01-09-2008, 10:43 PM
Interesting - by Marcus Julius - 01-17-2008, 05:28 AM
Re: Interesting - by Robert Vermaat - 01-17-2008, 04:11 PM
Re: Chinese Roman interaction. - by PMBardunias - 01-17-2008, 10:00 PM
Re: Chinese Roman interaction. - by Robert Vermaat - 01-17-2008, 11:56 PM
Re: Chinese Roman interaction. - by Komet - 01-30-2008, 12:47 AM

Forum Jump: