Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Was the Roman Army the most effective fighting force pre-gunpowder?
#14
(12-08-2015, 02:30 AM)Alexand96 Wrote: Getting back to the question at hand, I personally think it's worthwhile to choose a specific Roman commander and army before proceeding. Who do you think would crush Alexander or Hannibal? Who would crush Attila, Ghengis Khan, or Charlemagne? Even if we're just trying to have this discussion for fun, saying "Rome > everyone else" is too vague. Personally, I'd vote either Caesar or Scipio Africanus as the greatest Roman commanders/armies of all time.

Which brings us back to commanders. Whether you select a Roman army or a Medieval one is irrelevant. If you place someone like Caesar in command of a medieval army then it will beat a Roman army that is commanded by a less competent person.
Author: Bronze Age Military Equipment, Pen & Sword Books
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Was the Roman Army the most effective fighting force pre-gunpowder? - by Dan Howard - 12-08-2015, 04:20 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  How effective was Roman artillery in Field battle? Mrbsct 7 4,289 05-13-2013, 10:57 PM
Last Post: Valerian Pertinax
  How would Roman scouts number an opposing force? Marja 6 2,479 11-17-2012, 04:39 AM
Last Post: john m roberts
  When to use a knee to force someone back? Natuspardo 14 3,932 05-19-2007, 09:01 PM
Last Post: Mitra

Forum Jump: