Why didn\'t Romans fought in single line?
|
Why didn\'t Romans fought in single line?
|
08-07-2015, 09:18 AM
I understand that 2 lines provide reserves for the first line, had any unit gives up but doesn't it also make the army more prone to encirclement? If you say that 2 lines should be used only in an advantage in numbers, than it is not a very balanced fight after all. So my main concern is, how isn't the army became more prone to encirclement?
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Possibly Related Threads… | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
| Which Roman fought the most number of battles ? | Theodosius the Great | 8 | 2,064 |
10-20-2013, 01:07 PM Last Post: AMELIANVS |
|
| Why didn\'t the Romans conquer Scotland? | AureliusFalco | 18 | 9,852 |
05-08-2010, 03:59 PM Last Post: PhilusEstilius |
|
| Galearii - military slaves who fought | Tarbicus | 5 | 2,476 |
04-21-2007, 02:37 PM Last Post: drsrob |
|
