Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why didn\'t Romans fought in single line?
#6
However, it is not the multiple line system that is disputed or that is the main characteristic of what is called a quincunx formation, it is the intervals between the bodies of soldiers, their dimensions and use in battle. Multiple lines were indeed useful and were used by many nations, the Gauls and Greeks among them. We should also be careful to discuss intervals in the infantry line, as cavalry formations were diachronically very different with sizable gaps between squadrons.
Macedon
MODERATOR
Forum rules
George C. K.
῾Ηρακλῆος γὰρ ἀνικήτου γένος ἐστέ
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Why didn\'t Romans fought in single line? - by Macedon - 08-06-2015, 12:59 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Which Roman fought the most number of battles ? Theodosius the Great 8 2,064 10-20-2013, 01:07 PM
Last Post: AMELIANVS
  Why didn\'t the Romans conquer Scotland? AureliusFalco 18 9,852 05-08-2010, 03:59 PM
Last Post: PhilusEstilius
  Galearii - military slaves who fought Tarbicus 5 2,476 04-21-2007, 02:37 PM
Last Post: drsrob

Forum Jump: