Ancient History Magazine?

[Praefectusclassis]

Those with a more military interest probably already know our Ancient Warfare magazine. We're now exploring the idea of providing a 'gentler' (hmmm, backstabbing and political intrigue would be entirely appropriate as well...) sister to this belligerent magazine. Please provide your feedback on this idea!

[AMELIANVS]

Yes I would be interrested.

[Renatus]

I have tried to complete the questionnaire but one question requires an answer, without which one cannot proceed to the next step. It gives two alternatives, neither of which I am prepared to commit to. A less dogmatic alternative is needed to make this question realistic.

[John W Davison]

Jasper,

I have completed and this magazine would probably be read by two people in our house, so a very welcome arrival.

On your product range, I continue to hold the fond hope that one day you might launch a similar magazine as AW or MW covering European military history from Louis XIV to Napoleon, but in the meantime will continue to purchase the magazines you do choose to produce!

Regards, John

[Vindex]

Got all the way to Q13 and it won't accept "Other". so bailed out.

[Medusa Gladiatrix]

Already completed the poll to which I was linked via the Ancient Warfare newsletter.

[spqr95]

The magazine is perfect now, wonderfully illustated and edited.

[agrimensor]

get samples ready before EAA congress 2017 ( Maastricht)

[AMELIANVS]

The magazine is perfect now, wonderfully illustated and edited.

Possibility of completely new magazine is debated here not Old Ancient Warfare Magazine .-)

[Josho Brouwers]

That's unfortunate. I've removed the "required" restriction, so it should work properly now.

Edit: this was in response to the comment that Q13 could not be passed if you didn't fill in something other than "Other"... if you get what I mean. ;-)

[Renatus]

Sorry, as before I got stuck on Question 6. I don't agree with either statement.

[Praefectusclassis]

Hi Michael
What answer would you prefer for question 6?

[Renatus]

I think something less enthusiastic than Question 1 and less negative than Question 2. Maybe a simple 'Yes' or 'No'.