08-09-2004, 08:44 AM
Oh, there were a few things I forgot:<br>
<br>
- If you use legbindings, best not wear trousers that are too baggy. With normal, "sockless" trousers you always get a "poof" effect above the bindings. A little "poof" looks cool, a lot makes you look like a Russian Viking.<br>
And late Romans wearing a pilleus of fur or sheepskin already have problems with being mistaken for cossacks by members of the public...<br>
-the trousers Aitor refers to, according to the same friend of the leg bindings, were probably commonly worn in the early Middle Ages as well, since contemporary depictions of legbindings and trousers don't show a "poof" effect. Integral socks, or just a strip under the foot, keep the trousers' fabric "down". I don't know if this would work well with linen trousers though, since linen doesn't stretch much. Then again, in cold weather or climes a miles would prefer wool anyway.<br>
<p></p><i></i>
<br>
- If you use legbindings, best not wear trousers that are too baggy. With normal, "sockless" trousers you always get a "poof" effect above the bindings. A little "poof" looks cool, a lot makes you look like a Russian Viking.<br>
And late Romans wearing a pilleus of fur or sheepskin already have problems with being mistaken for cossacks by members of the public...<br>
-the trousers Aitor refers to, according to the same friend of the leg bindings, were probably commonly worn in the early Middle Ages as well, since contemporary depictions of legbindings and trousers don't show a "poof" effect. Integral socks, or just a strip under the foot, keep the trousers' fabric "down". I don't know if this would work well with linen trousers though, since linen doesn't stretch much. Then again, in cold weather or climes a miles would prefer wool anyway.<br>
<p></p><i></i>
Andreas Baede