10-29-2013, 05:45 PM
Excellent list Pavel! Which sources have you used to write it up?
If I can say my opinion, there are some things in this image with which I don't agree, but that's only because I'm really annoying , such as the chainmail (the leather parts I think were introduced later, are there any archaeological sources for them?, and pteruges that we can see in some iconography are probably only a classical convention). Also, the torque is correct but only if the soldiers depicted belongs to an élite force, if I am not wrong. Unfortunately the spatha I don't think is very realistic, it could be better if the hilt was on of the 4 types enlisted by Oakeshott, and its sheath doesn't fit archaeological finds, if I am not wrong.
By the way, I have to say that image give a rather good impression of a soldier of that time.
Quote:And artwork (not mine this time) made for the small Byzantine museum in Crecchio in Italy.It shows reality of equipment of 6th century roman soldier :
If I can say my opinion, there are some things in this image with which I don't agree, but that's only because I'm really annoying , such as the chainmail (the leather parts I think were introduced later, are there any archaeological sources for them?, and pteruges that we can see in some iconography are probably only a classical convention). Also, the torque is correct but only if the soldiers depicted belongs to an élite force, if I am not wrong. Unfortunately the spatha I don't think is very realistic, it could be better if the hilt was on of the 4 types enlisted by Oakeshott, and its sheath doesn't fit archaeological finds, if I am not wrong.
By the way, I have to say that image give a rather good impression of a soldier of that time.