Posts: 3,607
Threads: 226
Joined: Sep 2002
Reputation:
5
Quote:During our bouts we found that aside from the lovely metal ringing noise the public hear, the gladiator wearing the helmet can also be disorientated by such a blow - especially to the faceplate.
Junkelmann also describes hits against the helmet as very effective, giving the same reason. I made the same experience.
Quote:I have seen several gladiator shows, in the USA and in Europe, and I have to say that I felt Ars Dimicandi group gave the best 'historical' show I have seen.
As far as entertainment goes, and as far as the fights themselves are concerned, I can wholeheartedly second that.
But these guys also make a very good (IMO even better) "show", e.g.:
Talsker Wölfe
Talsker Wölfe I
Talsker Wölfe II
Talsker Wölfe III
That´s the question again: Why would I do all this?
As an experiment?
Or as a show?
If I were to do it as a show, but would use the label "(archaeological) experiment", how responsible would that be towards the audience? ( my question above )
I quote myself once again:
Quote:Every group that makes public displays should be aware of the fact that usually the visitors remember what they see unfiltered as factual. In that sense such displays are irresponsible towards the audience unless they are commented and the hypothetical character as well as mistakes or free interpretation of certain artefacts are explained to the audience.
Christian K.
No reconstruendum => No reconstruction.
Ut desint vires, tamen est laudanda voluntas.
Posts: 1,677
Threads: 75
Joined: Nov 2005
Reputation:
5
Quote:I think it is basically impossible to actually find out HOW gladiators fought, it is only possible to find out what kinds of movements were possible with the equipment, and what kinds of "moves" (ROFL) are sensible. However, people (also the Romans) often didn´t (or don´t, as is) behave in a way we would call "logical" or "practical". There may have been very well certain "ritualized" elements in gladiatorial combat which we will never know of.
So I don´t see a way to make a (scientific) EXPERIMENT which can tell us HOW gladiators actuall fought. This renders the use of hypothetical produced gladiatorial equipment unsensible. Sensible would be e.g. to reconstruct gladiatorial equipment, fill out the gaps as described above, and to test it under all kinds of different aspects. This also would have the spirit of a "true" experiment, since everybody could repeat it and gain very similar results (if not identical ones).
Very well put, Christian, I absolutely agree. I don't think there is any group at the moment that could seriously claim to be doing so. Pretty much the same where the term "experimetal archaeology" is wedded with reenactment groups (whatever era they may be in). Which is not to deny that many, many groups do a tremendous job in spreading knowledge, helping common misconceptions to be overcome and teaching the (interested) public on a high level.
Posts: 1,030
Threads: 149
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation:
0
Quote:Such blows are occsionally shown in mosaics, especially from tridents & spears ....
Do you have the examples to hand?
Thanks
Conal
Conal Moran
Do or do not, there is no try!
Yoda
Posts: 111
Threads: 19
Joined: Oct 2006
Reputation:
0
Dear Aurelianus, this is a reply for you
In answer to your criticisms on our resounding errors both on the armaments and on the techniques of fight, I beg you to look at these two video.
Before see this video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=shtYfeMxRLA
and then see this videos
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PDCOILg_9QY
The invitation is turned to all the frequenters of the forum.
I leave every comment to the numerous frequenters of this forum about it. :wink:
Besides I would like to answer to your question
Quote:
Quote:
By the way: Could you please explain me the reason why you always hit eachother with the swords at your helmets?
For modern and uninformed public that may be funny but ……….. O.K. now we are actually on the beginning of this discussion again ………
Well you have to know that AD gladiators don't hit eachother with the swords on the helmet of intention, but they try to climb over the defense and the shield of the adversary lowering from the tall one the hits of sica.
And the wide brim of gladiatorial helmets are used by the gladiators themselves to protect the hits of sica that arrive from the tall one, as you can see very well in these photos.
I'm not a gladiator but i know this dynamics of fight. :wink:
I hope to have been clear :roll:
Velite
Rita Lotti
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.arsdimicandi.net">www.arsdimicandi.net
Posts: 1,189
Threads: 33
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation:
2
Quote:ARudling:2u9tn7dh Wrote:Such blows are occsionally shown in mosaics, especially from tridents & spears ....
Do you have the examples to hand?
Thanks
Conal The Junkelmann book (I don't have it to hand) shows a lamp depicting a murmillo being led away from his opponent, a hoplomachus, with his hand over his visor. Clearly, he's taken a spear hit to the visor, wounding and perhaps blinding him.
In the Royal Ontario Museum I saw an eastern relief that clearly depicted a retiarius thrusting his trident into his secutor opponent's "bell" style helmet's visor. Sorry I can't post pictures. Maybe someone else here can.
Pecunia non olet
Posts: 7,668
Threads: 117
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation:
0
Different people and groups approach this activity with different things in mind, and different goals, different audiences, etc., etc. It's ok to be different. Some groups specialize in precise garments, long narratives explaining the sort of gladiator about to present himself to the public, while others don't bother with the precision, and some fight with soft or needledfelt weapons. If it's all for the entertainment of the crowd, and the crowd is entertained, it's all good.
Some prefer stage blood and hope to avoid the real blood, others don't bother with the stage blood. The crowds are happy? You did your job.
Some are more into the bluster and such, others are much more athletic and make quite a lot of sweat.
I was once in a gladiator group, and we had a lot of fun with "fighting" children, everyone using soft weapons. It was for the entertainment of the kids in that case, and not really about historicity. Mostly, the children won. It's all ok if that's the way it goes down. We attracted some attention to our venture, and people wanted to see more. For us, that is what it was all about, and we even let old fat men like myself be in the arena.
M. Demetrius Abicio
(David Wills)
Saepe veritas est dura.
Posts: 70
Threads: 5
Joined: Feb 2003
Reputation:
0
Ave!
Quote:...
By the way: Could you please explain me the reason why you always hit eachother with the swords at your helmets?
...
.
Just get yourself any authentic gladiator helmet. And try the following:
Your "freind" takes an authentic sica. And hit you on your helmet. With 100% strength. Then you will hear nothing but feel the blood which is wearm and slipy and which covers your eyes because the hit reaches your skull and the matal hurts the skin.. you are still alive but closer to the death than before.
And you will understand that the helmet is good but not everything once your retiarius friend punctures your helmet with a trident then as he pulls it back it, just hits your helmet from the side with the other end of the trident. As puncture hits your head it goes back 20cms and you feel your neck is going to break. But you have good muscles because 1000+ hours of training so you are still alive. Then you got the hit, so you loose your balance again. That means your shield does not cover you enough...
So in sentence for all these things. Try how it works and speak. But once you injure don't go to the hospital it is not real in 200 AD.
Posts: 70
Threads: 5
Joined: Feb 2003
Reputation:
0
Quote:Well you have to know that AD gladiators don't hit eachother with the swords on the helmet of intention, but they try to climb over the defense and the shield of the adversary lowering from the tall one the hits of sica.
And the wide brim of gladiatorial helmets are used by the gladiators themselves to protect the hits of sica that arrive from the tall one, as you can see very well in these photos.
I can say the same after 10+ years of "non experimental not archeology".
The wide brim is my main amour for my shoulders.
Posts: 626
Threads: 50
Joined: Nov 2006
Reputation:
1
You tell me nothing new about hitting each other on the helmet! And I know from my own experience that a right push with the scutum is much more effective.
Why I wrote the question:
Quote:By the way: Could you please explain me the reason why you always hit eachother with the swords at your helmets?
I just hit at the fact that I've seen several fights of Ars Dimicandi where they hit the helmets all too often and much more for show effect - nice sound - than anything else (even when they could place a nice “stabâ€
Lucius Domitius Aurelianus
Patrik Pföstl
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.roemer.ch.vu">http://www.roemer.ch.vu
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.celtae.de/SihFrewen/index.php">http://www.celtae.de/SihFrewen/index.php
.
Posts: 138
Threads: 19
Joined: May 2006
Reputation:
0
Quote:When I compare to the group of Marcus Junkelmann I just have to say that there are "worlds" between the works of both groups...... And it gets really clear why Junkelmann can talk about experimental archaeology in contrast to …….
Curtain closed
.
Thanks :wink:
Posts: 289
Threads: 11
Joined: Jul 2007
Reputation:
0
I think the pics were very good.
"The Kaiser knows the Munsters,
by the Shamrock on their caps,
And the famous Bengal Tiger, ever ready for a scrap,
And all his big battalions, Prussian Guards and grenadiers,
Fear to face the flashing bayonets of the Munster Fusiliers."
Go Bua
Posts: 284
Threads: 45
Joined: Feb 2006
Reputation:
0
I agree with both sides of the discussion. I agree that Ars Dimicandi hit each other a little to often. The sound of a metal weapon hit a metal helmet is something unique but mainly for the audience. I also think that they hit themselves a lot on the helment because they use metal weapons. Since they use metal weapons they have to sacrifice in some areas for the safety of the gladiators. Unfortunely, the Roman Empire is gone so we are unable to easily replace the gladiators. This is the modern age where slaves are no more, gladiator fighting is no longer an occupation except for a hobby, and killing people in the name of entertainment is highly frowned upon.
They could use wooden weapons instead of metal but I think that they would not be has highly thought of as they are. The gladiator school I belong to and the school I fight with use wooden weapons. I get hit all over including my helmet. Sometimes it just hurts for a while and every once and a while we break something.
Like M. Demetrius said each gladiator school does something different. Just like every Roman group does something different.
I like the pictures and videos that Ars Dimicandi does!!!
Joshua B. Davis
Marius Agorius Donatus Minius Germanicus
Optio Centuriae
Legio VI FFC, Cohors Flavus
[url:vat9d7f9]http://legvi.tripod.com[/url]
"Do or do not do, their is no try!" Yoda
Posts: 4,318
Threads: 127
Joined: Jan 2004
Reputation:
6
But is metal really more dangerous than wood? I would say the only things that bother are the thickness of the edges and the impact of the blow, bot the material. On the other hand, wood can get splinters, iron cannot.
I mean you can hit someone into hospital with a wooden one as easily as with a iron weapon.
Finally it's all about the purposes of the group, which I hope always have an educational part. Not purely art of fighting.
Posts: 1,086
Threads: 72
Joined: Nov 2004
Reputation:
0
Quote:But is metal really more dangerous than wood? I would say the only things that bother are the thickness of the edges and the impact of the blow, bot the material. On the other hand, wood can get splinters, iron cannot.
I mean you can hit someone into hospital with a wooden one as easily as with a iron weapon.
It is easier not to hurt someone with a wooden weapon than with a metal one. THe sheer weight of steel means that if you give a blade the impact sureface that would be 'safe' for a wooden one, its mass will make it a bone-breaker. You hae to actively pull your blows with those. A wooden blade just requires you nopt to use too much force - if you go too fast, you can let go of the grip and cause no more than a bruise. A metal blade only knows Physics 101.
Der Kessel ist voll Bärks!
Volker Bach
Posts: 1,962
Threads: 106
Joined: Apr 2003
Reputation:
7
Heavy impacts in a helmet can produce cerebral lesions, even no perceptibles for a long time. Heavy padding of helmets help to avoid that, but i think it's too serious to be avoided...
|