Posts: 7,668
Threads: 117
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation:
0
Quote:As a rule of thumb, they are generally 110cm long by 105cm wide
Surely the dimensions of the tunic were different, depending on the size of the body that would be wearing them, right?
M. Demetrius Abicio
(David Wills)
Saepe veritas est dura.
Posts: 655
Threads: 67
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
0
I have read in Sumner's books that based on know finds the length can deviate a bit, but aht the width seems to be pretty consistant.
The truth is we may not know for sure. If I understood what I have read correctly, it would seem to be easier to make a tunic shorter once it was issues insted of making it narrower based on how my mundane understanding of how they were made. Trimming a bit off the bottom for a slightly shorter troop would seem pretty easy to do, but I am speculating.
Thoughts?
Mike Daniels
a.k.a
Titus Minicius Parthicus
Legio VI FFC.
If not me...who?
If not now...when?
:wink: <img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/icon_wink.gif" alt=":wink:" title="Wink" />:wink:
Posts: 7,668
Threads: 117
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation:
0
You're right about the width being a lot harder to adjust. You'd have to re-seam one of the sides, and adjust the centering of the neckhole. Lots of trouble compared to simply hemming the bottom edge, no doubt about that.
My point was, however, that a man who stands 4 ft 8 in tall would have a different length of tunic than a man who stands 5 ft 11 in. I have come to really like the extra material in the width, as it makes the tunic very comfortable. A fascia ventralis takes up all that extra belly slack cloth, and that makes wearing the big tunic under armor that much smoother, allowing for those nice "wrinkle-pleats at the front and back" as seen on some statues to be visible. I don't always fold them in, but it's possible to do without much trouble using the "sash".
M. Demetrius Abicio
(David Wills)
Saepe veritas est dura.
Posts: 1,966
Threads: 79
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation:
22
Quote:I would say that a 1st/2nd century military tunic wouldn't ordinarily hang at the mid calves when unbelted. Examples of sleeved tunics usually do, but not sleeveless varieties. As a rule of thumb, they are generally 110cm long by 105cm wide ..
I generally found tunics to be wider than they are long, so more like 1.10m long by 1.15m wide. This would match one of the tunics found at Nahal Hever in Israel. Nevertheless the only certain size we have for any military tunic are the ones mentioned in the papyrus BGU VII 1564. They are 1.55m long by 1.40m wide. Yes, a few of these and you can make a tent! However Jim Bower's made and illustrated on RAT a credible reconstruction using these dimensions. However I would have thought that this was a standard size which was then altered to fit the wearer but that is only a guess on my part.
The point that tunics appear to be wider than they are long is demonstrated in both the Chatsworth relief and various figures on Trajan's column where the surplus material hanging at the side is clearly visible. Both are illustrated on pages 36-7 of Roman Military Dress.
Graham.
"Is all that we see or seem but a dream within a dream" Edgar Allan Poe.
"Every brush-stroke is torn from my body" The Rebel, Tony Hancock.
"..I sweated in that damn dirty armor....TWENTY YEARS!', Charlton Heston, The Warlord.
Posts: 208
Threads: 3
Joined: Jan 2008
Reputation:
0
I know some guys who wear the DPKA-Tunics, but they look really horrible. With so much Information in Graham Sumners books, it´s much more authentic to make a tunic by yourself (or from your wife or your mother :wink: )
I wear the 1,55m long and 1,40m wide tunic from BGU VII 1564 with, but more often without armour. I´m 1,93m tall with really long arms, but this tunic is so wide that it reached to the middle of my forearms and i must use a neck-knot to get the material up to my ellbows to make it much more comfortable for me. I find it nearly impossible to wear the tunic with this big neck-knot under my hamata, because the neckhole of my hamata is so tight that its full weight pressed it into my neck!
Marcus Iulius Chattus
_______________________
Marcus-Gerd Hock
Me that ave been what i´ve been-
Me that ave gone where i´ve gone-
Me that ave seen what i´ve seen-
...Me!
(Rudyard Kipling)
Posts: 13,279
Threads: 102
Joined: May 2006
Reputation:
3
http://www.facebook.com/inbox/readmessa ... 4744861494
hard to tell, but my tunic is quite loose and reaches past my elbows and below my knees when untied.
Very good for freedom of movement and also ventilation, except when under armour and subarmalis.
The neck hole may be smaller than originals, but I am sure I patterned it after Grahams information and images in the books.
I am the one in the background, with blue tunic and braided rope across my back.
Many thanks to lady in picture for sharing picture.
Visne partem mei capere? Comminus agamus! * Me semper rogo, Quid faceret Iulius Caesar? * Confidence is a good thing! Overconfidence is too much of a good thing.
[b]Legio XIIII GMV. (Q. Magivs)RMRS Remember Atuatuca! Vengence will be ours!
Titus Flavius Germanus
Batavian Coh I
Byron Angel
Posts: 208
Threads: 3
Joined: Jan 2008
Reputation:
0
Looks good, Byron.
I like my tunics looser, too. With the exception of the neck-knot, this particular tunic is really comfortable and reaches untied far beyond my knees. When i use my cingulum, the surplus material covers it complete and only the lower part of my apron is visible. I like that look really much, because it looks exactly like the Auxillary colour-plate in Grahams RMC-1.
Marcus Iulius Chattus
_______________________
Marcus-Gerd Hock
Me that ave been what i´ve been-
Me that ave gone where i´ve gone-
Me that ave seen what i´ve seen-
...Me!
(Rudyard Kipling)