Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why didn\'t Romans fought in single line?
#21
Being a bit Rome: Total War specific, here's a test battle I did for IBUR. The quincunx is effectively a static, reactive formation in the game. Very flexible, basically allowing units in the rear to respond to trouble spots quickly and with ease, and the second line of the checkerboard can either let the 1st line be pushed back into it, or pull up to engage. It distorts an enemy line with ease, causing it to break and create key exposures that can be exploited.

[Image: GiiGd3h.jpg]

Where I re-organized units for relief and other stuff:

[Image: cjYZpFJ.jpg]
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Why didn\'t Romans fought in single line? - by Flavivs Aetivs - 08-08-2015, 01:48 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Which Roman fought the most number of battles ? Theodosius the Great 8 2,099 10-20-2013, 01:07 PM
Last Post: AMELIANVS
  Why didn\'t the Romans conquer Scotland? AureliusFalco 18 9,889 05-08-2010, 03:59 PM
Last Post: PhilusEstilius
  Galearii - military slaves who fought Tarbicus 5 2,496 04-21-2007, 02:37 PM
Last Post: drsrob

Forum Jump: