01-18-2015, 10:36 AM
Renatus.
I would like you explain what you mean about the trimming of these phalerae being a margin of error and your view being that it makes the case of the makers of these plates being weakened, I don't follow what your trying to say here for where I have mentioned pictures and back plates I am pointing out that it is the size and width of these things that dictate the plates.
Then as far as the Newstead it would indeed be good to be able to see the other side of these plates, then where you say that the point about plates or phalera size can demolish the situation about the name on them then here I don't follow you, in fact with all your obsession about this name being on the inside then you tell me why it was put there for I would also like to know.
Then again with many things that are examined and looked at just a little bit better even such as the sword of Tiberius for instance we find that its scabbard has in fact a name on it and the sword blade also has a possible inlay in it.
I would like you explain what you mean about the trimming of these phalerae being a margin of error and your view being that it makes the case of the makers of these plates being weakened, I don't follow what your trying to say here for where I have mentioned pictures and back plates I am pointing out that it is the size and width of these things that dictate the plates.
Then as far as the Newstead it would indeed be good to be able to see the other side of these plates, then where you say that the point about plates or phalera size can demolish the situation about the name on them then here I don't follow you, in fact with all your obsession about this name being on the inside then you tell me why it was put there for I would also like to know.
Then again with many things that are examined and looked at just a little bit better even such as the sword of Tiberius for instance we find that its scabbard has in fact a name on it and the sword blade also has a possible inlay in it.
Brian Stobbs
