Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
An argument for the pace and not the cubit
#54
I have attached a copy of a forthcoming article that may be relevant to this discussion. Given that attachments are only visible to RAT members, I do not think my publisher will take offense if I pre-circulate it here, especially given the keen interest in the topic. I do respectfully request that no one re-post it outside of this forum.


Best,

Michael J. Taylor


Attached Files
.pdf   Historia-Taylor.pdf (Size: 307.54 KB / Downloads: 8)
Reply


Messages In This Thread
An argument for the pace and not the cubit - by antiochus - 12-11-2013, 11:08 AM
An argument for the pace and not the cubit - by antiochus - 12-13-2013, 03:17 AM
An argument for the pace and not the cubit - by antiochus - 12-15-2013, 07:27 AM
An argument for the pace and not the cubit - by antiochus - 12-17-2013, 09:58 AM
An argument for the pace and not the cubit - by antiochus - 12-20-2013, 05:54 AM
An argument for the pace and not the cubit - by antiochus - 12-22-2013, 01:50 AM
An argument for the pace and not the cubit - by antiochus - 12-22-2013, 04:15 AM
An argument for the pace and not the cubit - by Michael J. Taylor - 12-31-2013, 08:05 PM
An argument for the pace and not the cubit - by antiochus - 01-03-2014, 01:32 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  "in pace recepti"? Thiudareiks Flavius 5 3,221 07-10-2001, 02:08 PM
Last Post:

Forum Jump: