Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
High Imperial Roman army vs Late Roman army
Quote:Furthermore, Spain was never meant to see combat - the Spanish army existed but was not experienced. they would have had highly trained, but no veteran soldiers and Generals. When Maxentius usurped in Spain in 413, he had a Spanish Army, so it certainly did exist, but it was not a capable force.
I agree. Constantine III was attacked by several of Honorius' relatives - I imagine they had more than their own guards and kitchen slaves! I assume that the Spanish cities had militias, which (as we see in Gaul) were transformed after 411 into regular units, but I think of a much lower quality.
Robert Vermaat
MODERATOR
FECTIO Late Romans
THE CAUSE OF WAR MUST BE JUST
(Maurikios-Strategikon, book VIII.2: Maxim 12)
Reply


Messages In This Thread
High Imperial Roman army vs Late Roman army - by Robert Vermaat - 10-30-2013, 02:46 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Vegetius and the later Roman army: common mistakes? Robert Vermaat 2 237 05-10-2024, 02:41 PM
Last Post: Longovicium
Question Distances and distance measuring in the Roman Army? dcbrown 2 245 04-03-2024, 08:07 PM
Last Post: dcbrown
  Late Roman Army during the 5th century Robert Vermaat 89 18,070 01-11-2024, 04:34 PM
Last Post: Magister_Officiorum13241

Forum Jump: