Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
High Imperial Roman army vs Late Roman army
There is no evidence that the Roman army was any worse upto the time of Adrianople than it had been in previous centuries.

Perhaps the truth about Adrianople is that Valens actually did not expect to fight a battle that day, instead he did as Fritigern had asked in the 'ssecret letter' sent the night before i.e. turn up at the Gothic encampment in full battle array, negotiate peace terms and then return back to Adrianople before darkness fell. This may be the reason why Valens did not take the baggage train.

The army Theodosius commanded by necessity had to rely on an influx of Gothic troops as two thirds of the Eastern army no longer existed, having either been killed or deserted at Adrianople itself.
Adrian Coombs-Hoar
Reply


Messages In This Thread
High Imperial Roman army vs Late Roman army - by ValentinianVictrix - 10-27-2013, 12:20 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Vegetius and the later Roman army: common mistakes? Robert Vermaat 2 202 05-10-2024, 02:41 PM
Last Post: Longovicium
Question Distances and distance measuring in the Roman Army? dcbrown 2 209 04-03-2024, 08:07 PM
Last Post: dcbrown
  Late Roman Army during the 5th century Robert Vermaat 89 17,913 01-11-2024, 04:34 PM
Last Post: Magister_Officiorum13241

Forum Jump: