Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
High Imperial Roman army vs Late Roman army
#79
Quote:
Magister Militum Flavius Aetius post=336540 Wrote:Auxilliaries didn't have a ton of missile weapons like the Late Romans did. Plumbatae and Lancaea/Veruta would have rendered a large portion of a principate shields useless.

In the situation of plumbatae impacting the rounded scuta vs. pila impacting flat shields, I think the pila would disable more shields, but there would have been at least twice as many plumbatae as pila thrown, so maybe it would have been a wash. I would still give the advantage to the Principate legionaries in the ensuing hand to hand combat, all other things being equal.

It's too bad we can't really put this to the test. I suppose we could have reenactment groups from each period duke it out. That wouldn't be a perfect test, but I'd still pay to watch such an event. Smile

I'd pay too, just to scream "I TOLD YOU SO!"
Reply


Messages In This Thread
High Imperial Roman army vs Late Roman army - by Flavivs Aetivs - 04-30-2013, 04:14 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Vegetius and the later Roman army: common mistakes? Robert Vermaat 2 234 05-10-2024, 02:41 PM
Last Post: Longovicium
Question Distances and distance measuring in the Roman Army? dcbrown 2 244 04-03-2024, 08:07 PM
Last Post: dcbrown
  Late Roman Army during the 5th century Robert Vermaat 89 18,066 01-11-2024, 04:34 PM
Last Post: Magister_Officiorum13241

Forum Jump: