Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
High Imperial Roman army vs Late Roman army
#52
Quote:
Quote:Immediate result of this defeat,certainly wasn't that romans resigned from other attempts to subdue inner Germania

It takes a while to recover military strength and recover forces after 3 entire legions are reduced to a few straggling survivors. The other legions had other areas of responsibility, and couldn't just be pulled from there to Germania.

Hang on - for that's exactly what happened. Apart from the punitive raids thereafter - using what forces were available - the 3 legions lost were not replaced for 30 years; when Caligula raised the Primigenia pair for the, indeed, planned next campaign in Germania.

The legion total didn't get back to the 28 until Nero raised I Italica.

The overall inference is that, between 9AD and the invasion of Britain in 43AD it took ~23 legions to just stand still. Thereafter it seems legions were raised specifically in order to conduct the next campaign.

So - military strength wasn't 'recovered'.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
High Imperial Roman army vs Late Roman army - by Mark Hygate - 04-26-2013, 04:41 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Vegetius and the later Roman army: common mistakes? Robert Vermaat 2 233 05-10-2024, 02:41 PM
Last Post: Longovicium
Question Distances and distance measuring in the Roman Army? dcbrown 2 242 04-03-2024, 08:07 PM
Last Post: dcbrown
  Late Roman Army during the 5th century Robert Vermaat 89 18,065 01-11-2024, 04:34 PM
Last Post: Magister_Officiorum13241

Forum Jump: