Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
High Imperial Roman army vs Late Roman army
#3
There is no question that the seg is a superior piece of body armour,
As protection! It would seem it has issues in some minds due to the
Practicality of repairs in the field and expense!
I have yet to hear a convincing argument as to its real deficiencies
Though!
As time moved on the army evolved! However, whether it ended as a superior
Force may be debated! It certainly met with disastrous defeats
in the later period from which it was very hard pushed to recover from,
If it ever did, in comparison to the earlier army! But that can also be accounted
for by the attitudes of the citizens towards service as much as to any possible deficiencies
In tactics! They certainly cannot put the blame on poor equipment!
But there are many, more expert than I am who will have
Different opinions!
Visne partem mei capere? Comminus agamus! * Me semper rogo, Quid faceret Iulius Caesar? * Confidence is a good thing! Overconfidence is too much of a good thing.
[b]Legio XIIII GMV. (Q. Magivs)RMRS Remember Atuatuca! Vengence will be ours!
Titus Flavius Germanus
Batavian Coh I
Byron Angel
Reply


Messages In This Thread
High Imperial Roman army vs Late Roman army - by Gaius Julius Caesar - 04-23-2013, 11:55 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Vegetius and the later Roman army: common mistakes? Robert Vermaat 2 202 05-10-2024, 02:41 PM
Last Post: Longovicium
Question Distances and distance measuring in the Roman Army? dcbrown 2 208 04-03-2024, 08:07 PM
Last Post: dcbrown
  Late Roman Army during the 5th century Robert Vermaat 89 17,912 01-11-2024, 04:34 PM
Last Post: Magister_Officiorum13241

Forum Jump: