Posts: 13,279
Threads: 102
Joined: May 2006
Reputation:
3
Thats just like my day job..........ARRRRRRRRRGH!
Visne partem mei capere? Comminus agamus! * Me semper rogo, Quid faceret Iulius Caesar? * Confidence is a good thing! Overconfidence is too much of a good thing.
[b]Legio XIIII GMV. (Q. Magivs)RMRS Remember Atuatuca! Vengence will be ours!
Titus Flavius Germanus
Batavian Coh I
Byron Angel
Posts: 2,903
Threads: 18
Joined: Apr 2007
Reputation:
15
Yup !! .....Gotta agree with Jasper here ! (BTW - love that avatar!)
I have my own suspicions about Polybius' description of the legions which don't quite "ring true" in one or two places, but as so often, we just don't have the multiplicity of sources to cross-check !
But I'm with you, Byron - I like Polybius too...one of the more reliable historians, even with his Scipionic bias !! D D
As to standards, I had thought that the manus/hand was fairly obviously the maniple/handful standard, and the 'spearpoint' variety the century standard.
If each century was to manouevre independently, as many believe (including me) then a standard for each century would be necessary, just as Polybius tells us.
"dulce et decorum est pro patria mori " - Horace
(It is a sweet and proper thing to die for ones country)
"No son-of-a-bitch ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country" - George C Scott as General George S. Patton
Paul McDonnell-Staff
Posts: 416
Threads: 33
Joined: Mar 2007
Reputation:
0
Quote:So, if I judge everyone by this standard of critique, no one is to be trusted but my own interpretation of events
I trust you Byron! :wink:
Seriously though, I would tend to place more trust in someone from antiquity, such as the historians Svetonivs, Dio Cassivs, and Vellevs Patercvlvs more than a more modern writer, such as the 1800’s Robert Graves and/or the writers at HBO’s Rome for example.
Of course, even the ancients would have put their ‘spin’ on the events of history but, I feel the closer you are to the event, the greater the likelihood of the description being accurate.
For example, I’m quite sure that Julius Caesar, Marc Antony and later Octavian would have been labeled “traders to the Republicâ€
Vale!
Antonivs Marivs Congianocvs
aka_ANTH0NY_C0NGIAN0
My ancient coin collection:
[url:3lgwsbe7]http://www.congiano.com/MyCoins/index.htm[/url]
Posts: 366
Threads: 7
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation:
0
Quote:-- the 1800’s Robert Graves --
The what now?
** Vincula/Lucy **
Posts: 345
Threads: 48
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
0
The question is how many of our primary sources are in reality primary sources?
Normally all the historian, latin and greek, are considerated primary sources for all the events they described in their books, but in reality the great percentage of them are secondary sources: they aren't witness of the events, haven't possibily to talk directly to other witness, or they live one or more centuries after the events.
We use greatly Cassio Dio for Auguste reign, but he write 2 century after, so he can have used only previous historians or documents: no historian of thirty years war dreamed to call "primary source" the Schiller's history, even if probably he had access to better, clear and numerous sources respect those of Cassio Dio.
Furthermore the same events after 20-50 years probably have 2 or 3 different versions, some real some invented other mixed. The same Tucydides, the more modern of ancient historian, creates the discourses pronounced in own proper history (1.22.1) (like all the others), so is hard the imaginate what other historians can have created for fill gap in own proper sources.
As Finley told the ability of ancients for inventing and their capability to believe are persistently understimated.
"Each historical fact needs to be considered, insofar as possible, no with hindsight and following abstract universal principles, but in the context of own proper age and environment" Aldo A. Settia
a.k.a Davide Dall\'Angelo
SISMA- Società Italiana per gli Studi Militari Antichi
Posts: 434
Threads: 68
Joined: Nov 2001
Reputation:
2
Weeks ago someone told me an intriguing story about "guide-animals".
"Guide-animals" were a group of relevant animals that were used by men as reference for places or distinctive of some population or also as truely "guides" in the land. It is a sort of religious conception or an emotive believing similar to celt comprehension of the Nature.
In this group of animals are the lion, the wolf, the bear and the leopard. Yes, they are aggressive and dangerous animals, and it is not a case their hides were used to cover "guide-men" like the Signifers, tha must indicate the route to their companions.
Following all this, we arrive at the hand, that could represent a stronger message "follow me" to the following soldiers.
Could be not true, but I found it extremely interesting.
Posts: 8,090
Threads: 505
Joined: Jan 2005
Reputation:
0
Quote:Following all this, we arrive at the hand, that could represent a stronger message "follow me" to the following soldiers.
We know the raised hand was a regular signal from leaders, or at least in representation (which a signum's hand essentially also is).
http://www.utexas.edu/courses/romanciv/ ... marcus.jpg
TARBICvS/Jim Bowers
A A A DESEDO DESEDO!
Posts: 7,668
Threads: 117
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation:
0
For a guide animal, I think I'd prefer a Labrador retriever over a lion any time. :lol:
M. Demetrius Abicio
(David Wills)
Saepe veritas est dura.
Posts: 30
Threads: 4
Joined: Feb 2007
Reputation:
0
Thanks anyone for your input
I will look it over and see what comes out.
Sorry that i didn't respond sooner because i was very busy with performances. now i have the time to do some writing about standards
ATM
[size=150:1eo9aiz4]errare hvmanvm est[/size]
ALEXANDER TIBERIVS MAXIMVS
Gerard Schotgerrits
CORBVLO
|