Posts: 2,913
Threads: 21
Joined: Jan 2008
Reputation:
1
It is difficult to understand such an uncrenellated parapet as suggested by Dobson, for how high would such a parapet have to be to prevent anyone falling over the north side of the wall 3-5 to 4 feet maybe.
Then we have to consider just what kind of protection would such an uncrenellated parapet give to any soldier wanting to repel any attack.
Brian Stobbs
Posts: 1,982
Threads: 40
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation:
103
Quote:It is difficult to understand such an uncrenellated parapet as suggested by Dobson, for how high would such a parapet have to be to prevent anyone falling over the north side of the wall 3-5 to 4 feet maybe.
Then we have to consider just what kind of protection would such an uncrenellated parapet give to any soldier wanting to repel any attack.
No higher than waist-height, I would suggest. The Dobson position, as I understand it, is that the Wall was not intended to be a fighting platform, so crenellations would not be necessary.
Michael King Macdona
And do as adversaries do in law, -
Strive mightily, but eat and drink as friends.
(The Taming of the Shrew: Act 1, Scene 2)
Posts: 2,237
Threads: 275
Joined: Feb 2001
Reputation:
33
Quote:It is difficult to understand such an uncrenellated parapet as suggested by Dobson, for how high would such a parapet have to be to prevent anyone falling over the north side of the wall 3-5 to 4 feet maybe.
Then we have to consider just what kind of protection would such an uncrenellated parapet give to any soldier wanting to repel any attack.
Exactly. An uncrenellated parapet makes no sense and is unparalleled in Roman and later defences: the Castra Praetoria shows successive levels of crenellation, so if Hadrian's Wall had a parapet, it takes special pleading indeed to see it without merlons! The arguments have been well rehearsed by Paul Bidwell. The dislike of seeing the Wall as a fighting platform is an old meme that harks back to older ideas of how the Romans fought and the defence of Vetera shows it to be a questionable assumption. After all, a pilum murale is a special type of pilum designed to be used to defend a wall (... which would make it a fighting platform)!
Mike Bishop
You know my method. It is founded upon the observance of trifles
Blogging, tweeting, and mapping Hadrian\'s Wall... because it\'s there
Posts: 3,063
Threads: 218
Joined: Feb 2010
Reputation:
2
Quote:Vindex post=304533 Wrote:although there is no archaeological evidence for it as far as I am aware (except perhaps the Rudge Cup) logically what would it have?
There is actually some pretty good archaeological evidence in the form of large numbers of string course blocks, comparable to those still in situ on the fortress walls at Chester near the north gate, marking the level of the walkway (and base of the parapet). South Shields (although not on the Wall it is a handy parallel) has produced both SCBs and merlon caps. The infilling of demolished turret recesses (as at T41a) doesn't make much sense unless they carry a walkway over the top and a walkway needs a parapet (like the one still standing at Dura). I don't think Forestier was going out on much of a limb by including it ;-)
Mike Bishop
But string course blocks and merlon caps don't have to be for crenellations, do they? An educated guess of the archaeological remains but not bomb proof evidence. They can be mid wall markers (as you've said) and finishing off. The evidence at South Shields is why, I suppose, the reconstructed gateway is crenellated. (And I always consider it part of the Wall defences anyway...sort of...after a fashion).
But as I've aready said, it seems illogical to have a Wall without crenellations and I have little doubt that it could be used as a fighting platform as/when required.
Moi Watson
Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, Merlot in one hand, Cigar in the other; body thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and screaming "WOO HOO, what a ride!
Posts: 2,237
Threads: 275
Joined: Feb 2001
Reputation:
33
Quote:An educated guess of the archaeological remains but not bomb proof evidence.
The old rule of experimental archaeology: the higher you go above foundation level, the less certain you are of the accuracy! Unless you 'photocopy' Trajan's Column, as they did at the Lunt, of course, then you know it's bound to be 100% accurate ;-)
Mike Bishop
You know my method. It is founded upon the observance of trifles
Blogging, tweeting, and mapping Hadrian\'s Wall... because it\'s there
Posts: 1,982
Threads: 40
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation:
103
Quote:PhilusEstilius post=304626 Wrote:It is difficult to understand such an uncrenellated parapet as suggested by Dobson, for how high would such a parapet have to be to prevent anyone falling over the north side of the wall 3-5 to 4 feet maybe.
Then we have to consider just what kind of protection would such an uncrenellated parapet give to any soldier wanting to repel any attack.
Exactly. An uncrenellated parapet makes no sense and is unparalleled in Roman and later defences: the Castra Praetoria shows successive levels of crenellation, so if Hadrian's Wall had a parapet, it takes special pleading indeed to see it without merlons! A fort is one thing; 76 miles of wall is quite another. Moreover, Hadrian's Wall is indeed unparalleled in the Roman world.
Michael King Macdona
And do as adversaries do in law, -
Strive mightily, but eat and drink as friends.
(The Taming of the Shrew: Act 1, Scene 2)
Posts: 3,063
Threads: 218
Joined: Feb 2010
Reputation:
2
Quote:Vindex post=304638 Wrote:An educated guess of the archaeological remains but not bomb proof evidence.
The old rule of experimental archaeology: the higher you go above foundation level, the less certain you are of the accuracy! Unless you 'photocopy' Trajan's Column, as they did at the Lunt, of course, then you know it's bound to be 100% accurate ;-)
Mike Bishop
Moi Watson
Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, Merlot in one hand, Cigar in the other; body thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and screaming "WOO HOO, what a ride!
Posts: 2,913
Threads: 21
Joined: Jan 2008
Reputation:
1
Michael.
I think the idea about crenellations and Hadrian's Wall being 80 Roman miles is one where we have to consider such areas as Steel Rigg, and other points along its line where they may well not have been needed
Brian Stobbs
|