11-04-2006, 10:34 PM
Dear Gabinus
On the sources Dario has said that a list is preparing, and this is doing. But Dario is not busy only this! Then, in line with others his appointments he will publish. You don't worry.
On the woman archers, also I make part. However you have to know Gabinus, that I hold a great honor to be able to participate in the battles as true legionary with Ars. I am very happy that Ars also offers opportunity to women to be able to relive life from legionary.
There are women as me, very impassioned of history and particularly of Roman Army, therefore why to deny this possibility to women?
Women in Roman army were not, well we know this! But woman in Roman field of Ars they are legionaries and not women!
Then you say "Ars is not group reenacment", but this is not true. Ars is group reenacment however to Ars it doesn't interest to have glimmering armor or new shield. ARS interests to understand as it fought Roman army, what manoeuvres it used and what armaments legionaries Roman really wore. To others they interest details, to ARS it interests action (with experimentation).
Two ways of see the reenacment, two ways of see experimentation.
Last thing: someone has said (I don't remember who) "if Ars Dimicandi doesn't participate in the RAT it is not serious group"
Do you excuse but is the RAT a Forum of discussion or a bench of test? We have been forced to participate in the RAT because we had to defend us from your accusations to have been offensive towards the other groups.
Well, are we more serious now that we participate in the RAT forum?
Valete
On the sources Dario has said that a list is preparing, and this is doing. But Dario is not busy only this! Then, in line with others his appointments he will publish. You don't worry.
On the woman archers, also I make part. However you have to know Gabinus, that I hold a great honor to be able to participate in the battles as true legionary with Ars. I am very happy that Ars also offers opportunity to women to be able to relive life from legionary.
There are women as me, very impassioned of history and particularly of Roman Army, therefore why to deny this possibility to women?
Women in Roman army were not, well we know this! But woman in Roman field of Ars they are legionaries and not women!
Then you say "Ars is not group reenacment", but this is not true. Ars is group reenacment however to Ars it doesn't interest to have glimmering armor or new shield. ARS interests to understand as it fought Roman army, what manoeuvres it used and what armaments legionaries Roman really wore. To others they interest details, to ARS it interests action (with experimentation).
Two ways of see the reenacment, two ways of see experimentation.
Last thing: someone has said (I don't remember who) "if Ars Dimicandi doesn't participate in the RAT it is not serious group"
Do you excuse but is the RAT a Forum of discussion or a bench of test? We have been forced to participate in the RAT because we had to defend us from your accusations to have been offensive towards the other groups.
Well, are we more serious now that we participate in the RAT forum?
Valete
Velite
Rita Lotti
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.arsdimicandi.net">www.arsdimicandi.net
Rita Lotti
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.arsdimicandi.net">www.arsdimicandi.net
