11-17-2015, 02:27 PM
(11-17-2015, 02:22 PM)Renatus Wrote:(11-17-2015, 01:58 PM)jho Wrote: Neither is the find from Gamla really helpful als Stiebel - reasonably - reconstructs it as part of a manica, not a cuirass shoulder guard (which would not have fitted anyway as the soldier was wearing a segmentata). The complete publication is available online at academia.edu here:
http://www.academia.edu/6331895/_The_Mil...hapter_14_
Is this reference correct? I see nothing about armour in it. It seems to be concerned entirely with archery and artillery equipment.
Apologies, this should be the correct one:
https://www.academia.edu/11320285/_Chapt...pp._57-108
Regards,
Jens Horstkotte
Munich, Germany
Jens Horstkotte
Munich, Germany