More spam - Printable Version +- RomanArmyTalk (https://www.romanarmytalk.com/rat) +-- Forum: Community (https://www.romanarmytalk.com/rat/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: Round Table (https://www.romanarmytalk.com/rat/forumdisplay.php?fid=21) +--- Thread: More spam (/showthread.php?tid=6914) |
Re: More spam - Guest - 01-22-2007 user = BigMovies http://www.romanarmy.com/rat/profile.ph ... ile&u=2739 Another likely suspect. Re: More spam - Martin Moser - 01-23-2007 http://www.romanarmy.com/rat/viewtopic. ... highlight= user = peedrogirl Re: More spam - Tarbicus - 01-23-2007 link from old RAT Prat. Doesn't even disguise the links. We're definitely getting a lower class of spammer this week. Re: More spam - Robert Vermaat - 01-23-2007 naughty naughty naughty boys..... :lol: Re: More spam - Tarbicus - 01-23-2007 and girls :wink: Re: More spam - Robert Vermaat - 01-23-2007 Girls? I meant you and Paul... 8) Re: More spam - Tarbicus - 01-23-2007 Re: More spam - Martin Moser - 01-24-2007 http://www.romanarmy.com/rat/viewtopic. ... highlight= user = ENGINESSQ Re: More spam - Praefectusclassis - 01-24-2007 Got him. :twisted: I am currently outright banning all domains that spawn spammers, if they're not used by legit RAT users. I believe it helps, a bit anyways... Re: More spam - Guest - 01-25-2007 More trash to toss & burn. user = MissLOVEmee http://www.romanarmy.com/rat/profile.ph ... ile&u=2762 Re: More spam - Jeroen Pelgrom - 01-25-2007 has been taken care of: "Sorry, but no such user exists." Re: More spam - Guest - 01-25-2007 Another suspect. Lurking? user = -=aphthasol=- http://www.romanarmy.com/rat/profile.ph ... ile&u=2768 Re: More spam - Guest - 01-25-2007 More trash to toss & burn: user = drRobertH http://www.romanarmy.com/rat/profile.ph ... ile&u=2772 http://www.romanarmy.com/rat/search.php ... ults=posts Re: More spam - Guest - 01-25-2007 Looks like another new, lame lurker. user = aglagmurbk http://www.romanarmy.com/rat/profile.ph ... ile&u=2771 I'd fry'em fast. Another Proposal - Guest - 01-25-2007 How about if we require new members to complete a suitable profile before senior management allows them to post? I doubt most spammers would take the time to do a decent job, and senior managers would be more able to determine who to allow to post, and who should get canned/sacked! Ohhh, ohh, let me help do it! (sound of axe being sharpened on grinding stone) *g* Seriously, I'd be glad to help screen & pass or pitch. |