Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
AntonivsMarivsCongianocvs Presentation discussion
#13
Quote:It seems like a tall order for those of us who aren't swimming in cash
Hmm. Did you look at Matt Luke´s or Martin Moser´s presentation, or at the model presentation?

Quote:Other examples I can think of are the subarmalis and pteruges. None survive. Yet, would wearing them for an impression disqualify the candidate ?
No, it wouldn´t if it were a specific soldier from a specific tombstone wearing such an item were the model for it, for example. Smile

Quote:Touche. I forgot about those Then again, those helmets would serve well in my answer to your last question. They are clearly ancestors to the helmets from the Early Imperial period and as such can be used to create a more plausible reconstruction.

A more plausible interpretation, I´d say, but yes.
Again, it´s not that I want to keep anyone from getting the award, but something based not on an actual find is not a reconstruction, hence not eligible. I really hope we get that other award going, since it were quite sensible to also honour work like this.
Christian K.

No reconstruendum => No reconstruction.

Ut desint vires, tamen est laudanda voluntas.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: AntonivsMarivsCongianocvs Presentation discussion - by caiusbeerquitius - 07-31-2007, 09:52 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Primvs Pavlvs presentation discussion Peroni 7 11,943 01-14-2008, 04:56 PM
Last Post: Chuck Russell
  caiustarquitius - presentation caiusbeerquitius 0 6,751 05-06-2007, 06:34 PM
Last Post: caiusbeerquitius
  Model Presentation caiusbeerquitius 0 6,692 05-18-2006, 05:36 PM
Last Post: caiusbeerquitius

Forum Jump: