Posts: 79
Threads: 11
Joined: Mar 2007
Reputation:
0
How was this battle fought ? i found some sources where it says that they had rock throwing catapults mounted on the ships and fought from distance other sources dont mention anything about that , plus Mark Antony had a larger force combined with Cleopatra and more experience but still lost , maybe naval battles was hes weakness who knows
Posts: 6,734
Threads: 489
Joined: Mar 2001
Reputation:
27
It's true that the battle has been hotly debated, but the argument of Tarn and Richardson mostly revolves around a very literal interpretation of a poem by Horace which - even with a lot of imagination - is not really suitable for such an interpretation. Kromayer's article is still one of the best though there is newer literature which confirms his - and Dio's views of the battle - from archaeology:
D.Harrington, ‘The battle of Actium – A study in historiography’, Ancient World 9 (1984)
W.M.Murray, ‘The Spoils of Actium’, Archaeology 41 (1988), 28-35;
A.Loupiac, ‘La trilogie d’Actium et l’epode IX d’Horace: document historique ou Carmen symposiacum’, Revue des etudes latines 75 (1997), 129-140;
W.M.Murray, ‘Reconsidering the battle of Actium’, in: V.Gorman & E.Robinson, Oikestes. Studies in Constitutions, Colonies and Military Power in the Ancient World offered in honor of A.J.Graham. Mnemosyne suppl.231 (Leiden 2002), 339-359.