Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Mainz Calceus Reconstruction
#46
Quote:Ah, I think that I now see. I'm looking towards the inside back up from the sole, not down into the shoe.

Right!

Quote: The other piece of leather that I am seeing is the tongue.

If you are referring to the leather that fills the upper third of the pic, that actually is the inside of the vamp area. Of the tongue itself only a tiny bit where it is sewn to the vamp is visible.
Reply
#47
Quote:If you are referring to the leather that fills the upper third of the pic, that actually is the inside of the vamp area. Of the tongue itself only a tiny bit where it is sewn to the vamp is visible.
Yes, I was referring to the tiny edge of leather that is visible in the upper third of the picture. I've heard the term "vamp" before. Definition?
Titus Licinius Neuraleanus
aka Lee Holeva
Conscribe te militem in legionibus, vide mundum, inveni terras externas, cognosce miros peregrinos, eviscera eos.
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.legiotricesima.org">http://www.legiotricesima.org
Reply
#48
Quote:I've heard the term "vamp" before. Definition?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoe#Vamp.2C_or_upper

:-) )
Reply
#49
I don't know if it has been discussed before, but what would have been the reason to have the flesh side out on the Mainz calcei? What's the advantage in that?

vale,
Jef Pinceel
a.k.a.
Marcvs Mvmmivs Falco

LEG XI CPF vzw
>Q SER FEST
www.LEGIOXI.be
Reply
#50
Quote:I don't know if it has been discussed before, but what would have been the reason to have the flesh side out on the Mainz calcei? What's the advantage in that?

Good question, but there is no real advantage or answer that I can think of besides aesthetics. All that remains is the fact that that is the way they reportedly were made.
Reply
#51
Quote:
Marcus Mummius:19rfwcy3 Wrote:I don't know if it has been discussed before, but what would have been the reason to have the flesh side out on the Mainz calcei? What's the advantage in that?

Good question, but there is no real advantage or answer that I can think of besides aesthetics. All that remains is the fact that that is the way they reportedly were made.

I see. I would think that it's more difficult to keep the flesh side clean, as it's rougher. But it will be easier to get into the calcei while wearing wool udones when the smooth side is on the inside, as there is less grip/friction between the leather and the wool.

Vale,
Jef Pinceel
a.k.a.
Marcvs Mvmmivs Falco

LEG XI CPF vzw
>Q SER FEST
www.LEGIOXI.be
Reply
#52
I realize I'm a couple years behind hear, I've sort of been out of the loop.
Martin, those are awsomely beautiful shoes :!: , and your pics and use of the real method of construction are absolutely impressive. I am re-inspired.
Qvintvs Florentivs Agrippa
aka Jared Fleury
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.florentius.com">www.florentius.com
Reply
#53
Hi Jared,

glad to hear you like them :-) )
Reply
#54
Boy, time is passing fast! It's already more than 4 years since I last did these. Well I just finished another pair, a little variant this time if you will, 5 tabs instead of 4 to close the shoe and a different nailing pattern with a distinctive X , found with a sole in Castleford.

[Image: MainzCalceusAlfredo_15.jpg]

For a few more pics see http://sutor.jimdo.com/shoes/roman-shoes/mainz-calceus/
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  My first attempt at lasted shoe making (the Mainz calceus) Neuraleanus 3 1,365 09-02-2008, 06:19 AM
Last Post: jvrjenivs
  Mainz Ledermuseum Caliga Reconstruction Matt Lukes 34 9,267 01-30-2008, 08:07 PM
Last Post: Matt Lukes

Forum Jump: