Posts: 422
Threads: 28
Joined: May 2004
Reputation:
0
voted bad
RESTITVTOR LIBERTATIS ET ROMANAE RELIGIONIS
DEDITICIVS MINERVAE ET MVSARVM
[Micha F.]
Posts: 4,029
Threads: 90
Joined: May 2005
Reputation:
0
He only took care of himself an nothing else.
Posts: 15,116
Threads: 415
Joined: Mar 2002
Reputation:
76
I'm no longer thát big a fan of him, but I feel I should say at least something in his defence. He dÃd manage to stabilise the East after Adrianople, did he not?
Posts: 227
Threads: 30
Joined: Aug 2004
Reputation:
0
He preserved the unity of the empire (good), and defeated several enemies (good), but accepted the autority of a superior force (bad) and leaved the throne to 2 incompetents (bad). So he is ok.
Posts: 190
Threads: 26
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation:
0
I voted A bad emperor but i have already discussed it in an earlier tread.
Tot ziens.
Geert S. (Sol Invicto Comiti)
Imperator Caesar divi Marci Antonini Pii Germanici Sarmatici ½filius divi Commodi frater divi Antonini Pii nepos divi Hadriani pronepos divi Traiani Parthici abnepos divi Nervae adnepos Lucius Septimius Severus Pius Pertinax Augustus Arabicus ½Adiabenicus Parthicus maximus pontifex maximus