11-04-2006, 05:14 AM
Quote:Steve Sarak:22eqx70s Wrote:Not if the enemy is wearing segmentata (i.e. in the event of a civil war), in which case accidentally standing on the armour would likely cause a legionary great problems--hobnails have no grip on anything smooth.Hibernicus:22eqx70s Wrote:I would think that marching and advancing over obstacles would have been practiced.
We have often used haybales as obstacles to practicing line advances, or deliberately sought broken or rough ground, or a fields with shrubs and perhaps other obstacles to practice in.
I can' t imagne the Romans NOT doing something similarly practical.
[/b]
It sounds like your group really gets a feel of what it was like to be legionary back then.
So even though walking over the slaughtered may be messy, with practice it could be done without worry of falling.
Thanks
That’s a good point, and I can’t see anything being done about that, so I’d assume in a case like that, when there became an impasse, to dangerous to fight on the line, that either you took the time to check your footing, or else fell back a few paces, drawing the enemy with you, so either they fought on bad ground or both fought past the carnage, or at least until it was time to move again.
That brings up another question. How stationary was the line of contact. Did one side usually get pushed back? Against barbarians I could see that, but what about during the civil wars. Roman against Roman, where the two sides met, did the fighting usually stay there, both side fighting back and forth or did one side, for what ever reason, usually get pushed back?
Steve