09-06-2006, 08:14 AM
Quote:Another potential hurdle is that the ‘site name’ system can get unbelievably cumbersome. If there is a problem with deciding precisely which ‘Robinson’ type you have, you can always hedge the bet by saying something like ‘Imperial Gallic H/I’. This is much easier to do than stringing apparently endless place names together. You only have to look at the late pattern helmets to see what a mess using ‘find spots’ can get us into.
This I would count as the main argument against the names-method. However, I do not really agree.
Niedermörmter Guttmann 2002 would be quite clear.
In general, a classification based on stylistic devices seems to me inadequate: Too unclear, too subjective.
Christian K.
No reconstruendum => No reconstruction.
Ut desint vires, tamen est laudanda voluntas.
No reconstruendum => No reconstruction.
Ut desint vires, tamen est laudanda voluntas.