Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Naming conventions and images
#26
Quote:Another potential hurdle is that the ‘site name’ system can get unbelievably cumbersome. If there is a problem with deciding precisely which ‘Robinson’ type you have, you can always hedge the bet by saying something like ‘Imperial Gallic H/I’. This is much easier to do than stringing apparently endless place names together. You only have to look at the late pattern helmets to see what a mess using ‘find spots’ can get us into.

This I would count as the main argument against the names-method. However, I do not really agree.

Niedermörmter Guttmann 2002 would be quite clear.

In general, a classification based on stylistic devices seems to me inadequate: Too unclear, too subjective.
Christian K.

No reconstruendum => No reconstruction.

Ut desint vires, tamen est laudanda voluntas.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Re: Naming conventions and images - by Peroni - 09-01-2006, 01:37 PM
Re: Naming conventions and images - by Peroni - 09-01-2006, 10:16 PM
Re: Naming conventions and images - by Restitvtvs - 09-01-2006, 11:00 PM
Re: Naming conventions and images - by Caratacus - 09-03-2006, 09:16 PM
Re: Naming conventions and images - by Peroni - 09-04-2006, 08:20 AM
Re: Naming conventions and images - by Caratacus - 09-04-2006, 04:59 PM
Re: Naming conventions and images - by Peroni - 09-04-2006, 10:11 PM
Re: Naming conventions and images - by caiusbeerquitius - 09-06-2006, 08:14 AM
Re: Naming conventions and images - by Tarbicus - 09-06-2006, 08:33 AM
Re: Naming conventions and images - by Peroni - 09-06-2006, 10:10 AM
Re: Naming conventions and images - by Alexandr K - 09-14-2006, 11:25 AM
Re: Naming conventions and images - by Alexandr K - 09-14-2006, 12:00 PM

Forum Jump: