06-03-2009, 11:09 PM
More along the lines that it isn't referenced much. Although recent publication, to be sure, the material in it has been about for a while.
I found it cogently argued and, as Boiy admits, not quite the "silver bullet". Several aspects make inordinate common sense and I suspect that Pat Wheatley (can't wait for his Demetrius bio) would, in large part, be in agreement.
The book should firmly put to rest - if it were needed - the idea that the campaign of Iran (Eumenes/Antigonus) took place over 316-15.
I found it cogently argued and, as Boiy admits, not quite the "silver bullet". Several aspects make inordinate common sense and I suspect that Pat Wheatley (can't wait for his Demetrius bio) would, in large part, be in agreement.
The book should firmly put to rest - if it were needed - the idea that the campaign of Iran (Eumenes/Antigonus) took place over 316-15.
Paralus|Michael Park
Ἐπὶ τοὺς πατέρας, ὦ κακαὶ κεφαλαί, τοὺς μετὰ Φιλίππου καὶ Ἀλεξάνδρου τὰ ὅλα κατειργασμένους
Wicked men, you are sinning against your fathers, who conquered the whole world under Philip and Alexander!
Academia.edu
Ἐπὶ τοὺς πατέρας, ὦ κακαὶ κεφαλαί, τοὺς μετὰ Φιλίππου καὶ Ἀλεξάνδρου τὰ ὅλα κατειργασμένους
Wicked men, you are sinning against your fathers, who conquered the whole world under Philip and Alexander!
Academia.edu
