Posts: 6,734
Threads: 489
Joined: Mar 2001
Reputation:
27
So...what do we think. Is this the Germanic Cohors I Classica with an extra epithet (Ã la Spaul) or is this a separate unit? IIRC the newest diploma made two units the more probable explanation. But if so, where did it come from? Was the ClBr reduced in strength and the superfluous soldiers formed into a cohort? Was it founded completely separately from the ClBr?
Posts: 6,734
Threads: 489
Joined: Mar 2001
Reputation:
27
IIRC the Cohors I Classica is still mentioned in 2nd century diplomata from Germania Inferior, so they would have existed side by side.
Posts: 133
Threads: 7
Joined: May 2005
Reputation:
0
Jasper - help me!
Can't find it, but what is the earliest mention of the Cohors Classica Aemiliana? Can't spout more nonsense until I know that!
Christoph Rummel
Posts: 6,734
Threads: 489
Joined: Mar 2001
Reputation:
27
Aemiliana? Never :wink:
Aeliana, IIRC somewhere in the 120s AD
Posts: 133
Threads: 7
Joined: May 2005
Reputation:
0
aaah... my famous brain-finger-keyboard coordination skills kick in! Must stop smoking things when thinking...
If it really is around as early as 120s, I think the CLBRIT idea is unlikely. In archaeological terms, Dover does undergo disinct changes at this point in time, but the main base at Boulogne appears to continue without any major interruptions at all.
Of coure its always difficult to indetify changes in archaeology, but from all we know, there CLBRIT remained one unit and remained in a more or less set format from the Flavian period until the mid 3rd century...
I still opt for the Aeliana as an entirely new creation!
Btw - what 2nd cent. diploma is the Cohors Classica mentioned in? what a drag, to have one of those carrying on into the 2nd century...
Christoph Rummel