09-20-2005, 02:01 PM
A question to those more conversant with original finds: How common was it for Roman wooden items (wax tablets, boxes, chests, stools etc.) to be painted? I know some of the items from the Cave of Letters were painted, and the leather items in many cases dyed, but is that representative? Do we have evidence either way?
I still believe the Roman Army was a good deal more colourful than we think, at least in peacetime, and this one started me wondering. Most reenactment displays have wooden items oiled, not painted, and for tools and weapons that makes sense, but what about the rest?
Also, if we have evidence for painting, i could contemplate cheating and using plywood or glued-together wood rather than shell out huge amounts for solid wood in odd sizes.
I still believe the Roman Army was a good deal more colourful than we think, at least in peacetime, and this one started me wondering. Most reenactment displays have wooden items oiled, not painted, and for tools and weapons that makes sense, but what about the rest?
Also, if we have evidence for painting, i could contemplate cheating and using plywood or glued-together wood rather than shell out huge amounts for solid wood in odd sizes.
Der Kessel ist voll Bärks!
Volker Bach
Volker Bach