Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Roman Archer shields?
#1
Hello,

In our group there are going to be a couple of men portraying roman archers. We do early second century reenactment.

Now we have a question left about archers, did they use shields? And if so what kind of shields? Or did they work in pairs, ie one with a shield, the other one with a bow?

On Trajan's collum it looks as if they have shields...or do we observe this wrong?

Thanks,
Tom Pinceel
a.k.a.
Caius Titius Verus

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.LEGIOXI.be">www.LEGIOXI.be
Reply
#2
Are you looking at Auxilliary archers?? Because that will change a lot in terms of shield pattern

also, It is my opinion (I have little data to back this) that an archer would not carry a shield. You need two hands to work a bow, and I personnaly would drop the shield as soon as I got into a battle situation.
Nonnie
Reply
#3
Yes, sorry I should have specified; I'm speaking of auxilia archers.

Were there "regular " Roman archers? Or were they all auxilia?

greets,
Tom Pinceel
a.k.a.
Caius Titius Verus

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.LEGIOXI.be">www.LEGIOXI.be
Reply
#4
Legionaries are trained to use bows as with slings but probably not to use as a regular weapon. Archers seem to be auxilia. I have never seen archers with bows and shields. Originally groups turned out archers with pointed helms and long tunics and mail but Guard bowmen are dressed like the rest of the auxilia and can drop their bow and pick up a shield.
Quod imperatum fuerit facimus et ad omnem tesseram parati erimus
Reply
#5
Also Auxilliary tended to be used to scouting, hunting etc. since archers had bows I'm geussing that hunting was left to them, large shields would make such tasks difficult and why produce something that would rarely get used?
Nonnie
Reply
#6
Archers in most periods, Roman included, were exceptionally vulnerable to determined attack by either enemy infantry or cavalry. The accounts I have read of Roman archers (and I mean for you to read this as Roman AUXILIARY archers, when I say "Roman archers") in action, say that they would either cut and run if charged, or else they had a screen of regular infantry ready to intervene. They were massacred if they couldn't get away or the infantry troops acting as a screen didn't hold.
At most, you might carry a small round shield, which could be attached to your belt, or hung from a baldric, on your left side. The key is to keep obstacles out of the way and clear for drawing the bow. A standard auxiliary shield would be far too big.
Arrian, in his account of facing Sarmatian cavalry, placed his archers behind eight ranks (if I recall correctly) of legionary troops. They were to "shoot" over the heads of the infantry into the attacking Sarmatian cavalry. At the same time, they were well protected by those same eight ranks of legionaries.

Marcus Quintius Clavus/Quinton
Quinton Johansen
Marcus Quintius Clavus, Optio Secundae Pili Prioris Legionis III Cyrenaicae
Reply
#7
Thanks you all!!!

This helps!
Tom Pinceel
a.k.a.
Caius Titius Verus

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.LEGIOXI.be">www.LEGIOXI.be
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Is this a suitable bow for a late roman archer? Virilis 5 2,016 04-02-2012, 05:12 PM
Last Post: Virilis

Forum Jump: