02-19-2006, 01:03 PM
There is indeed considerable argument, but it is very unlikely indeed the Romans had what we know as oranges. Citrus fruit are not native to the Mediterranean originally, and though some were established early, we do not know exactly which onmes and how early. Citrons are usually assumed to have been the earliest, known in Hellenistic times under the name 'Median apples', though that interpretatuion is disputed. Lemons, on the other hand, ar usually thought to have been introduced in either Roman or Byzantine times, and are in common use around 1200 at the latest.
Oranges are also mentioned in medieval literatire, though not earlier than that. Howeer, in all likelihood these were more like what we today call bitter oranges, suitable for candying or turning into sauces, not something you'd eat as fruit. The usual assumption for both oranges and lemons is an introduction in the 700-1100 timeframe, but proof is hard to come by.
Oranges are also mentioned in medieval literatire, though not earlier than that. Howeer, in all likelihood these were more like what we today call bitter oranges, suitable for candying or turning into sauces, not something you'd eat as fruit. The usual assumption for both oranges and lemons is an introduction in the 700-1100 timeframe, but proof is hard to come by.
Der Kessel ist voll Bärks!
Volker Bach
Volker Bach
