Theoretical Roman Archaeology

[richsc]

With all the talk of experimental archaeology, I was wondering what and how relevant the "Theoretical Roman Archaeology Conference" was. From the site, I'm not sure what 'theoretical' is. It's a part of the "Roman Archaeology Conference" and they've both been going on for a while.<br>
<br>
www2.arts.gla.ac.uk/RAC2001/index.htm<br>
<br>
It is interesting that a past conference said:<br>
"Roman military archaeology has the image of being an unglamorous and somewhat backward branch of Roman archaeology. Yet the papers offered for the general session soon revealed that there was an exciting variety of research currently being undertaken with an explicitly theoretical agenda."<br>
<br>
Take a glance at the papers presented at this conference:<br>
<br>
www.dur.ac.uk/~drk0www2/#army<br>
<br>
<br>
<p>Richard Campbell, Legio XX.
http://www.geocities.com/richsc53/studies/
ICQ 940236
</p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://pub45.ezboard.com/bromanarmytalk.showLocalUserPublicProfile?login=richsc>RichSC</A> at: 5/3/02 4:45:14 am<br></i>