04-19-2002, 03:04 AM
Greetings,<br>
<br>
From another thread, I found the livius.org website and was reading its articles on the legions and their history by Jona Lendering:<br>
<br>
www.livius.org/le-lh/legio/legions.htm<br>
<br>
There are several assertions in the article about the creation and ultimate fate of several legions that were different than what I had thought. Since Parker's book was my first exposure to legionary history, I still am skeptical of anything that contradicts him. However, his book was over 70 years old now. So, my question is: Does this article fairly represent currently accepted scholarly research or is it pure theory?<br>
For instance:<br>
Legio V Alaudae destroyed in 70 AD not in the 80s under Domitian.<br>
Legio XIV destoyed in 54 AD but immediately reconstitued.<br>
Both Legio XXX Ulpia & II Traiana formed in 105 AD. etc.<br>
<br>
There are other examples. But, after having read the awful Collins book about the Tenth Legion, I am very leary of any information that disagrees with what I thought was the accepted version.<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Aussum <p></p><i></i>
<br>
From another thread, I found the livius.org website and was reading its articles on the legions and their history by Jona Lendering:<br>
<br>
www.livius.org/le-lh/legio/legions.htm<br>
<br>
There are several assertions in the article about the creation and ultimate fate of several legions that were different than what I had thought. Since Parker's book was my first exposure to legionary history, I still am skeptical of anything that contradicts him. However, his book was over 70 years old now. So, my question is: Does this article fairly represent currently accepted scholarly research or is it pure theory?<br>
For instance:<br>
Legio V Alaudae destroyed in 70 AD not in the 80s under Domitian.<br>
Legio XIV destoyed in 54 AD but immediately reconstitued.<br>
Both Legio XXX Ulpia & II Traiana formed in 105 AD. etc.<br>
<br>
There are other examples. But, after having read the awful Collins book about the Tenth Legion, I am very leary of any information that disagrees with what I thought was the accepted version.<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Aussum <p></p><i></i>