08-09-2016, 01:29 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-09-2016, 01:44 PM by deBeauharnais.)
Greetings everyone,
I was wondering about the current state of the research on ancient artillery. Having very recently finished my Master thesis about roman artillery, I extensively read on the subject, and it was clear that academic research in some way reached its conclusion. The latest articles were basically final improvements of the "new" theories that were much discussed since the famous 2003 article from Aitor Iriarte. I'm thinking of the 2011 and 2015 articles from Duncan Campbell (Some hypothesis reexamined and What did the ballista really look like) and the 2009 article from Hart and Lewis (The Hatra ballista). Two monographies also took (some) of these novelties into account (2007's The Catapult from Rihll and 2008's Oxford handbook of engineering... from Oleson).
So these were my questions :
- Did recent works validate them further - or disprove them?
- Did recent finds bring some confirmations ? - On this subject, the thracian kambestrion from Kayumov, Minchev 2010, in my opinion, could in no way have outswinging arms.
- Did Alan Wilkins further substantiated his static-and-outswinging-artillery position ? I would be very interested to find some new concrete objections on the subject.
- Do general-purpose books on the ancient military art include the modern design of the palintonon artillery ? I would love to see a new edition of Greek and Roman artillery, with some drawings of the real palintonon ballista by Brian Delf !!
Thanks in advance for your answers
I was wondering about the current state of the research on ancient artillery. Having very recently finished my Master thesis about roman artillery, I extensively read on the subject, and it was clear that academic research in some way reached its conclusion. The latest articles were basically final improvements of the "new" theories that were much discussed since the famous 2003 article from Aitor Iriarte. I'm thinking of the 2011 and 2015 articles from Duncan Campbell (Some hypothesis reexamined and What did the ballista really look like) and the 2009 article from Hart and Lewis (The Hatra ballista). Two monographies also took (some) of these novelties into account (2007's The Catapult from Rihll and 2008's Oxford handbook of engineering... from Oleson).
So these were my questions :
- Did recent works validate them further - or disprove them?
- Did recent finds bring some confirmations ? - On this subject, the thracian kambestrion from Kayumov, Minchev 2010, in my opinion, could in no way have outswinging arms.
- Did Alan Wilkins further substantiated his static-and-outswinging-artillery position ? I would be very interested to find some new concrete objections on the subject.
- Do general-purpose books on the ancient military art include the modern design of the palintonon artillery ? I would love to see a new edition of Greek and Roman artillery, with some drawings of the real palintonon ballista by Brian Delf !!
Thanks in advance for your answers