08-09-2016, 11:55 AM
If you Speak about this one is hardly true:
http://edh-www.adw.uni-heidelberg.de/edh...t/HD046333
D(is) M(anibus) / Antonio H/ermo mil(iti) / leg(ionis) I Ital(icae) sti(pendiorum) / XIX vix(it) an(n)is / XXXX Iul(ius) Ru/fus mil(es) leg(ionis) / I Ital(icae) et Nome[nt]/an(us) b(ene) m(erenti) p(osuerunt)
I found this to be most unfortunate mistake not sure about the source, can you please give me the source that states 30 years Dan?
http://edh-www.adw.uni-heidelberg.de/edh...t/HD046333
D(is) M(anibus) / Antonio H/ermo mil(iti) / leg(ionis) I Ital(icae) sti(pendiorum) / XIX vix(it) an(n)is / XXXX Iul(ius) Ru/fus mil(es) leg(ionis) / I Ital(icae) et Nome[nt]/an(us) b(ene) m(erenti) p(osuerunt)
I found this to be most unfortunate mistake not sure about the source, can you please give me the source that states 30 years Dan?