01-05-2002, 01:25 PM
>re: Quintus et Vardulli<br>
<br>
Alas, poor Southwark Gladiatrix who wasn't... soon as I read your post I checked the reports and yes, the "evidence" was flimsy to non-existent. Are you really suggesting that the Museum of London possibly have put a spin on what they did(n't) really have??!<br>
<br>
"non contemnenda ea parva sine quibus magna constare non possunt"..... (in this case, omit the first "non"). <p></p><i></i>
<br>
Alas, poor Southwark Gladiatrix who wasn't... soon as I read your post I checked the reports and yes, the "evidence" was flimsy to non-existent. Are you really suggesting that the Museum of London possibly have put a spin on what they did(n't) really have??!<br>
<br>
"non contemnenda ea parva sine quibus magna constare non possunt"..... (in this case, omit the first "non"). <p></p><i></i>