04-12-2001, 05:32 AM
Salve,<br>
<br>
The third century is also one of my pet subjects, reason why I gave you such a hard time on the other forum. It is a much neglected century with many works simply skipping this period and going from the high empire to the fourth century as if there was nothing in between.<br>
<br>
Stephenson's <i> Roman infantry equipment. The later empire</i> is a rare publication focusing on the army of the third century. I am still writing a review of it and I will post that somewhere next week. It is a good book, though since the subject has my special attention my review is getting drawn out to include a short sketch of the development of the third century army.<br>
<br>
Vale,<br>
<br>
Sander van Dorst <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://pub45.ezboard.com/bromanarmytalk.showLocalUserPublicProfile?login=sandervandorst>Sander van Dorst</A> at: 4/12/01 7:47:48 am<br></i>
<br>
The third century is also one of my pet subjects, reason why I gave you such a hard time on the other forum. It is a much neglected century with many works simply skipping this period and going from the high empire to the fourth century as if there was nothing in between.<br>
<br>
Stephenson's <i> Roman infantry equipment. The later empire</i> is a rare publication focusing on the army of the third century. I am still writing a review of it and I will post that somewhere next week. It is a good book, though since the subject has my special attention my review is getting drawn out to include a short sketch of the development of the third century army.<br>
<br>
Vale,<br>
<br>
Sander van Dorst <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=http://pub45.ezboard.com/bromanarmytalk.showLocalUserPublicProfile?login=sandervandorst>Sander van Dorst</A> at: 4/12/01 7:47:48 am<br></i>
