Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Centurion Caligatus
#1
Any thoughts on this paper?


Attached Files
.pdf   Some remarks of an Inscription in ZPE 71.pdf (Size: 1.65 MB / Downloads: 32)
Reply
#2
Interesting, thanks.
Robert Vermaat
MODERATOR
FECTIO Late Romans
THE CAUSE OF WAR MUST BE JUST
(Maurikios-Strategikon, book VIII.2: Maxim 12)
Reply
#3
It is always astonishing that you can write a profound article of 18 pages about such a short inscription. It just shows us, how unkown the Rangordnung of the roman army still is.

I am afraid, we have still not found the real pattern of promotion. Not for NCOs and not for centurions. We even do not know, what was really considered a rank by a roman, and what was just a function. For example optio carceris. It sounds like a function. And the rank of this optio was perhaps sesquiplicarius. If not even duplicarius finally, because he was promoted to evocatus from there after 16 years of service. But pay = rank is just one of many theories out there.

Interestingly Caesius never served as a "taktische Charge" (optio, signifer in a centuria). Domaszewski called that a must, for any promotion to centurio. Even some cornicularii (highest senior NCO), who had always served in offices (librarii, etc. ) and  never served in a centuria, became optio spei before they could advance to centurio. Another sign, that Caesius had strong patronage?
Ut desint vires, tamen est laudanda voluntas
Reply


Forum Jump: