11-21-2012, 02:28 AM
Jurjen,
My post did not answer a person directly since I did not mention any names. It was Crispvs who mentioned the date.
Brian, can it be conclusively proven that the inlay was some sort of enamel in that original you are showing. Otherwise, I have to agree with Jurjen that these types are well into the 2nd C AD.
My post did not answer a person directly since I did not mention any names. It was Crispvs who mentioned the date.
Brian, can it be conclusively proven that the inlay was some sort of enamel in that original you are showing. Otherwise, I have to agree with Jurjen that these types are well into the 2nd C AD.
"You have to laugh at life or else what are you going to laugh at?" (Joseph Rosen)
Paolo
Paolo