Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Property in provinces
#5
A citizen could not own Roman land in the provinces in the same way that he could in Italy, that is purchasing land as a res mancipi, a formal witnessed transaction.

In theory, provincial land belonged to the Roman people: it owed taxes by its very status as provincial land, unlike Italic soil. However, Roman citizens could and did obtain possess provincial land; in short in the provinces the Romans modified their thinking about possession to accommodate land that could not technically be owned; this possessio could be bought and sold. Later, the legal fiction of emphyteusis, which was theory a long term lease from the state, but usually mean de facto ownership, on the condition of a nominal rent. Finally, some provincial land might be declared "Italian land," a legal fiction that allowed ownership to be transferred and made it largely tax free.

To sum up: the strictures of Roman law did not accommodate ownership of provincial land. To compensate, the Romans created legal fictions to allow people to either possess or lease land in a manner that amounted to ownership in everything but name.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Property in provinces - by Makas - 10-10-2015, 03:07 PM
Property in provinces - by Lothia - 10-10-2015, 03:22 PM
Property in provinces - by Makas - 10-10-2015, 05:02 PM
Property in provinces - by Lothia - 10-12-2015, 11:54 PM
Property in provinces - by Michael J. Taylor - 10-13-2015, 12:44 AM
Property in provinces - by Lothia - 10-14-2015, 01:30 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Healing property of wool? richsc 6 3,403 05-07-2012, 01:35 AM
Last Post: M. Caecilius

Forum Jump: