Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
New DNA study on Sub-Roman Britain
#13
I now have a PDF of the full paper. In reference to my earlier comments the following quotation from the paper is very telling, "‘Old’ and ‘recent’ here are relative terms—we can infer the order of some events in this way but not their absolute times. Although we refer to migration events, we cannot distinguish between movements of reasonable numbers of people over a short time or ongoing movements of smaller numbers over longer periods." I expect that a lot of the pronouncements in the press are exaggerations of what the authors have actually claimed, sensationalised by rather ignorant press hacks.
Martin

Fac me cocleario vomere!
Reply


Messages In This Thread
New DNA study on Sub-Roman Britain - by Walhaz - 03-18-2015, 07:53 PM
New DNA study on Sub-Roman Britain - by Caballo - 03-23-2015, 07:19 PM
RE: New DNA study on Sub-Roman Britain - by John1 - 02-18-2017, 10:06 PM
RE: New DNA study on Sub-Roman Britain - by kavan - 02-19-2017, 08:43 AM
RE: New DNA study on Sub-Roman Britain - by kavan - 02-21-2017, 10:23 AM
New DNA study on Sub-Roman Britain - by Walhaz - 03-18-2015, 10:02 PM
New DNA study on Sub-Roman Britain - by John1 - 03-18-2015, 11:10 PM
New DNA study on Sub-Roman Britain - by John1 - 03-19-2015, 10:55 AM
New DNA study on Sub-Roman Britain - by Urselius - 03-19-2015, 11:59 AM
New DNA study on Sub-Roman Britain - by Walhaz - 03-19-2015, 02:36 PM
New DNA study on Sub-Roman Britain - by Urselius - 03-19-2015, 04:02 PM
New DNA study on Sub-Roman Britain - by John1 - 03-19-2015, 04:58 PM
New DNA study on Sub-Roman Britain - by Urselius - 03-20-2015, 07:57 AM
New DNA study on Sub-Roman Britain - by Urselius - 03-20-2015, 08:34 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  A Biometric Study of equids in the roman world TITVS SABATINVS AQVILIVS 3 2,889 06-28-2007, 09:18 AM
Last Post: philsidnell

Forum Jump: