07-08-2014, 06:07 PM
I'm presently reading a book on roman syria. at the end of the 1st century bc and during the 1st century ad, parts of the roman province of syria were directly occupied by the romans. Others were ruled by client kings. from what i've read, Pompei has taken this kind of arrangement from the ancient seleucids and marc antony and augustus have improved it.
what remains unclear to me is why Pompei did this. why did he not impose direct rule on the whole province of syria. what's the point of having client kings. you'll see that the romans were not satisfied either. emperors like vespasian and successors were quick to eliminate these client kingdoms. some gave the romans more troubles than benefits, like for instance herod who had some encounters with his nabatean neighbours;
I think direct rule is more easy to do in syria than in for instance gaul or germania.
they could have taken over the administrative structure which the seleucids used to administer their states. i think there were enough officials to do so. or am i wrong? when vespasian or his successors took over a kingdom, you'll see for instance that armies of the client kings were made a part of the roman auxilia. so direct rule could be done administratively...
so again, what's the point of having client kings instead of imposing direct rule?
what remains unclear to me is why Pompei did this. why did he not impose direct rule on the whole province of syria. what's the point of having client kings. you'll see that the romans were not satisfied either. emperors like vespasian and successors were quick to eliminate these client kingdoms. some gave the romans more troubles than benefits, like for instance herod who had some encounters with his nabatean neighbours;
I think direct rule is more easy to do in syria than in for instance gaul or germania.
they could have taken over the administrative structure which the seleucids used to administer their states. i think there were enough officials to do so. or am i wrong? when vespasian or his successors took over a kingdom, you'll see for instance that armies of the client kings were made a part of the roman auxilia. so direct rule could be done administratively...
so again, what's the point of having client kings instead of imposing direct rule?
Yves Goris
****
Quintus Aurelius Lepidus
Legio XI Claudia Pia Fidelis
Reburrus
Cohors VII Raetorum Equitata (subunit of Legio XI CPF)
vzw Legia
Flanders
****
Quintus Aurelius Lepidus
Legio XI Claudia Pia Fidelis
Reburrus
Cohors VII Raetorum Equitata (subunit of Legio XI CPF)
vzw Legia
Flanders