09-16-2013, 10:39 PM
I am currently working on Dio and I have the original text (according to TLG) read that Sulpicius Galba overcame the Chatti and Publius Gabinius defeated the Maurisians and so he retrieved the third and last eagle lost by Varus in 9 AD.
" ὅ τε Γάλβας ὁ Σουλπίκιος Χάττους ἐκράτησε, καὶ Πούπλιος Γαβίνιος Μαυρουσίους νικήσας τά τε ἄλλα εὐδοκίμησε, καὶ ἀετὸν στρατιωτικὸν ὃς μόνος ἔτι παρ’ αὐτοῖς ἐκ τῆς Οὐάρου συμφορᾶς ἦν ἐκομίσατο" 60.8.7.1
The problem is that the translation I used to check up the text says that Gabinius conquered the Chauci, while the text clearly says the Maurisians. What is wrong here? Can it be that it was Galba who retrieved the last eagle from the Chatti? Has anyone asserted that Dio made a mistake? Or maybe, is there another text of Dio mentioning the Chauci instead of the Maurisians?
Actually, right after, Dio again speaks of the Mauri and positively identifies them as Mauritanians, so it seems that either the Moors had the third eagle in their possession or it was Galba who retrieved it -always according to Dio-.
" ὅ τε Γάλβας ὁ Σουλπίκιος Χάττους ἐκράτησε, καὶ Πούπλιος Γαβίνιος Μαυρουσίους νικήσας τά τε ἄλλα εὐδοκίμησε, καὶ ἀετὸν στρατιωτικὸν ὃς μόνος ἔτι παρ’ αὐτοῖς ἐκ τῆς Οὐάρου συμφορᾶς ἦν ἐκομίσατο" 60.8.7.1
The problem is that the translation I used to check up the text says that Gabinius conquered the Chauci, while the text clearly says the Maurisians. What is wrong here? Can it be that it was Galba who retrieved the last eagle from the Chatti? Has anyone asserted that Dio made a mistake? Or maybe, is there another text of Dio mentioning the Chauci instead of the Maurisians?
Actually, right after, Dio again speaks of the Mauri and positively identifies them as Mauritanians, so it seems that either the Moors had the third eagle in their possession or it was Galba who retrieved it -always according to Dio-.