Posts: 101
Threads: 21
Joined: Apr 2013
Reputation:
0
26 July 2013
Not sure which periods each are from
if I understand correctly Mainz
came first before the Castleford's
is that correct?
From which period are each in use.
Is it strictly the Flavian Period or latter?
What is acceptable in the USA and the European Reenactor Association
which is used more often.
If I like the Castleford's will I be sent home if I am the only one wearing them?
Posts: 101
Threads: 21
Joined: Apr 2013
Reputation:
0
Thank You Evan;
Useful advice I will be sure to make note of that.
Geoffrey Ives
Posts: 3,607
Threads: 226
Joined: Sep 2002
Reputation:
5
Quote:DSC's Castleford and Mainz Caligae, best 1st century Caligae on the market. Both are acceptable for the whole 1st, and early 2nd century.
That´s a bold statement. I do not agree. Martin Moser´s shoes are way better, also Sarah Juniper´s or Meister Knieriem´s. I also think that the AER Caligae are indeed better, as the e.g. the straps on the DSC ones are way to wide in comparison to the originals etc.... , whereas the DSC shoes are way cheaper. So, I think each of the products has its strengths and weaknesses.
=> Also, I think this should be in the marketplace section...
Christian K.
No reconstruendum => No reconstruction.
Ut desint vires, tamen est laudanda voluntas.
Posts: 875
Threads: 58
Joined: Jan 2011
Reputation:
0
I have a pair of DSC Castlefords, they are good and certainly light years ahead of Deepeekas caligae. My only complaint is that the insole may have to be replaced by thicker leather. This is an easy fix though, thought I solved with 8-9oz leather
Quintus Furius Collatinus
-Matt
Posts: 875
Threads: 58
Joined: Jan 2011
Reputation:
0
Also, the Mainz are I believe dated to Republic times I want to say. The leather straps on the Mainz are much thicker than the original, the Castlefords are more accurate to the original, although not perfect
Quintus Furius Collatinus
-Matt